kirkdickinson
Contributor
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2015
- Messages
- 174
I have a pool that is getting full and the drives are also getting old. I haven't had a failure (yet). The pool has 6 WD 4-gig Red Plus drive in ZFS2 configuration. I am thinking about replacing them all with 8TB drives.
I was looking at Backblaze Drive stats today and saw this Seagate drive that a failure rate of 0% over 12,088 drive days and it is cheaper than the WD Red Plus drives that I was looking at. I see that they are using fewer of them than some of the other drives, so I realize that the failure rate might be higher if they had more examples.
Seagate https://www.newegg.com/seagate-exos-7e8-st8000nm000a-8tb/p/1Z4-002P-01A30
Western Digital https://www.newegg.com/red-wd80efax-8tb/p/1Z4-0002-00B89
Also see the Toshiba MG0ACA16TEY has a 0% failure rate with a lot more individual drives. That is way more storage than I need, but the price for those Toshibas, at least on Newegg is really close to the WD Plus drives. https://www.newegg.com/toshiba-mg08aca16te-16tb/p/1Z4-000B-00FR7
Why is Blackblaze using SATA drives instead of SAS drives?
What are the thoughts here on my options?
I was looking at Backblaze Drive stats today and saw this Seagate drive that a failure rate of 0% over 12,088 drive days and it is cheaper than the WD Red Plus drives that I was looking at. I see that they are using fewer of them than some of the other drives, so I realize that the failure rate might be higher if they had more examples.
Seagate https://www.newegg.com/seagate-exos-7e8-st8000nm000a-8tb/p/1Z4-002P-01A30
Western Digital https://www.newegg.com/red-wd80efax-8tb/p/1Z4-0002-00B89

Also see the Toshiba MG0ACA16TEY has a 0% failure rate with a lot more individual drives. That is way more storage than I need, but the price for those Toshibas, at least on Newegg is really close to the WD Plus drives. https://www.newegg.com/toshiba-mg08aca16te-16tb/p/1Z4-000B-00FR7
Why is Blackblaze using SATA drives instead of SAS drives?
What are the thoughts here on my options?