Proxipupuce
Explorer
- Joined
- May 11, 2023
- Messages
- 80
Okay, then I'll run MemTest.Memtest tests that memory is operating to specifications. There are bad memory modules in the wild, including ECC modules. Not many hopefully, but it's best to check.
Okay, then I'll run MemTest.Memtest tests that memory is operating to specifications. There are bad memory modules in the wild, including ECC modules. Not many hopefully, but it's best to check.
Actually, they are electrically compatible, it's purely a software thing (and theoretically a power delivery thing, but that's a dodgy argument).LGA1151-2 (Coffee Lake: Core 8000/9000, Xeon E-2100/2200) is electrically incompatible with LGA1151 (Skylake/Kaby Lake: Core 6000/7000, Xeon E3-1200 v5/v6). Intel wants you to buy everything anew every two generations. ("C'est une révolution ! Il faut TOUT racheter !")
So much so that I've had servers die (yes, die) due to broken firmware that was mishandling one of the voltage regulators, causing premature wear. Two servers gone in a handful of months. Three of the other four we had, after we updated the firmware, are still working, one died ~three years later. Lenovo x3550 m5.I was just wondering if this was also true for servers
That's right, I'd completely forgotten that I3 cores support ECC RAM! After looking, yes, you can find a lot of I3-9100f around 35 €. Thanks a lot!But you can use a Core i3-8100/9100 with C246 and have ECC. Only four cores but these are cheap and plentiful.
Okay, that reinforces my belief in the need for constant updating!So much so that I've had servers die (yes, die) due to broken firmware that was mishandling one of the voltage regulators, causing premature wear. Two servers gone in a handful of months. Three of the other four we had, after we updated the firmware, are still working, one died ~three years later. Lenovo x3550 m5.
Okay, thanks !No and no.
Core, Xeon E, E3 and W-1000 (= Core with ECC) and Ryzen only support UDIMM.
To use cheaper and higher capacity RDIMM you need to go for Xeon E5, Scalable, W-2000, W-3000, Xeon-D, Atom C or EPYC.
This would be my personal preference, having both the aspeed 2500 (html5 no java) and the ability to independently control every fan are the things that push it over the edge for me.Second configuration: €450
Motherboard: ASRock E3C246D4U2-2T (€265)
CPU: Intel Core I3 9100F (€35)
RAM: Samsung 2 x 32 GB ECC UDIMM DDR4-3200 (here limited to 2400 Mhz) (€150)
I agree, in fact I'd just gone for the F version, as I couldn't see the point of an IGPU. However, if it's better, I'll take this!a 9100 would likely not break the bank.
I'm not sure at the moment, but I'm thinking of going for it, as I'd need more recent equipment and the possibility of upgrading.If you think you may need more cores and/or more than 64 GB RAM at some point (which the 2*32 GB might point to…), go for AsRock Rack (not the same company as consumer-minded AsRock) and wait for an opportunity on a Xeon E-2000.
Thanks for your feedback!This would be my personal preference, having both the aspeed 2500 (html5 no java) and the ability to independently control every fan are the things that push it over the edge for me.
Either transcoding videos or hosting a desktop OS, which needs a GPU, in a VM. If none applies, there's indeed no point.I agree, in fact I'd just gone for the F version, as I couldn't see the point of an IGPU.
Do not buy used PSUs unless you A) have the capability to ascertain their health or B) you have deep confidence the seller is not telling you bullshit. It takes very little to lose your system to a faulty PSU.Quick question, I found the Seasonic Focus PX-750 power supply for less than €100 second-hand. After discussion with the seller, the power supply has apparently been used very little. Do you think it's a good idea to buy it used, or would it be better to buy it new?
For the moment, I don't do either. That said, it could happen in the future, so I'm thinking of getting an I3 9100.Either transcoding videos or hosting a desktop OS, which needs a GPU, in a VM. If none applies, there's indeed no point.
Yes, I still need to think about this. However, isn't it possible, on eight SATA ports, to connect the six new disks in RAIDZ2, and only two of the three disks in RAIDZ1 to copy the data? (In case I don't have any SSDs connected in SATA).Mind that evolving from 3-wide raidz1 to 6-wide raidz2 involves backing up, destroying the pool and creating a new pool—no in-place upgrade of geometry.