diskdiddler
Wizard
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2014
- Messages
- 2,377
This is occurring in 2 browsers.
> ses1: da19,pass21: SAS Device Slot Element: 1 Phys at Slot 19 > ses0: phy 0: parent 5001c4500095d8bf addr 5001c4500095d893 > ses0: da25,pass27: Element descriptor: 'Slot 020' > ses1: da30,pass32: Element descriptor: 'Slot 020' > ses0: da25,pass27: SAS Device Slot Element: 1 Phys at Slot 20 > ses1: da30,pass32: SAS Device Slot Element: 1 Phys at Slot 20 > ses0: phy 0: parent 5001c4500095d8bf addr 5001c4500095d894 > ses0: da29,pass31: Element descriptor: 'Slot 021' > ses1: da26,pass28: Element descriptor: 'Slot 021' > ses0: da29,pass31: SAS Device Slot Element: 1 Phys at Slot 21 > ses1: da26,pass28: SAS Device Slot Element: 1 Phys at Slot 21 > ses0: phy 0: parent 5001c4500095d8bf addr 5001c4500095d895 > ses0: da18,pass20: Element descriptor: 'Slot 022' > ses1: da22,pass24: Element descriptor: 'Slot 022' > ses0: da18,pass20: SAS Device Slot Element: 1 Phys at Slot 22 > ses1: da22,pass24: SAS Device Slot Element: 1 Phys at Slot 22 > ses0: da17,pass19: Element descriptor: 'Slot 023' > ses1: da20,pass22: Element descriptor: 'Slot 023' > ses0: da17,pass19: SAS Device Slot Element: 1 Phys at Slot 23 > ses1: da20,pass22: SAS Device Slot Element: 1 Phys at Slot 23
I did a little searching and found it was submitted as a bug already and the response appears to be that it is going to be removed from the UI.Good question.
It's rigid and hard to integrate with other things. The information gathered won't change much, apart from some additions, but some might end up condensed.How so? Current reporting in old UI is very nice, reliable. If lacking a couple of small things (disk temp)
The new UI is making progress, however I agree that the real estate is not used wisely, and/or scripting/browser problems are plaguing the operation of the UI.
I use pfSense 2.4 as my firewall/Router. I like the simplicity of the design, the consistency of layout and most of all, a Dashboard I can customize. The ability to choose the widget, place/order it to my liking and also have the ability to customize how the widget looks/works. Widgets like traffic graphs are real-time; not only adding "sizzle" but can be informative when reviewing current system performance/load.
Just my 2 cents worth.
Check out a nightly release before you complain about something that is clearly stated as being in beta, it never ceases to amaze me how people continually crap on something that is in development, expecting it to be perfect. It happened continually with Corral and it is still happening. If you like Synology's DSM so much keep using it, I see no glaring issues with the new UI that results in catastrophic failure, I think it looks great and is going to be miles better than the current UI. Sure some things are broke, but that happens when you're building stuff from scratch. The devs have stated that 11.1 is for getting all the "base" features working, 11.2 will be all about the new UI, and 11.3 will be all about IOcage, Docker, and the new plugins.
If you hate the new UI so much, why don't you help redesign it or provide some useful input other than "Wow the new UI sucks!! Synology's DSM is totally bad ass and the devs should steal the design they have!"
I see no reason why you're bashing a mod, or using one person's preference as proof of your opinion. It's ridiculous.
Please, leave for a year, or more, we don't need your ridiculous negativity here.
It's been in development for roughly a year now. These things take time, especially since the API needed to be reworked simultaneously.Looks like someone has been waiting to long for a non beta GUI,
I'd expect that, in the time it took to post this, you could have searched the bug reports yourself for an answer. But the last time I tried it, it was simply your OS's mechanism to paste--Edit/Paste, right-click/paste, command-V on a Mac, etc. Edit: and on the nightly I just installed, that continues to work as expected.I'm going to almost 100% assume that making a bug entry "how the heck do we paste into a console session, without the old paste button" would be marked as redundant, right?
There was definitely a ticket for that.I'm messing with this for testing (nightly) - I'm going to almost 100% assume that making a bug entry "how the heck do we paste into a console session, without the old paste button" would be marked as redundant, right? Surely someone else has brought this up?
I'd expect that, in the time it took to post this, you could have searched the bug reports yourself for an answer. But the last time I tried it, it was simply your OS's mechanism to paste--Edit/Paste, right-click/paste, command-V on a Mac, etc. Edit: and on the nightly I just installed, that continues to work as expected.
Could someone please tell me what blocked means on a bug report Bug #28738? This is still an issue on the latest build of the nightly (FreeNAS-11-MASTER-201804060352). There is no way to access the Active Directory users/groups from with in the new GUI and when you switch to the old GUI you can access them but when you save the permissions on an data set to an AD user/group and then go back in to check it's back to root/wheel. There is no way to set AD permissions in the new or old GUI.
Kind Regards,
Simon
Here's one ticket I found, there may be more:This does not work on my PC, at all. Windows 10, chrome. Latest nightly.