SSL vulnerability - apache24/php7

Status
Not open for further replies.

danpoleary

Dabbler
Joined
Nov 29, 2013
Messages
42

Joshua Parker Ruehlig

Hall of Famer
Joined
Dec 5, 2011
Messages
5,949
a freenas update would in no way affect thus vulnerability since it sounds like he is using apache with SSL. in the jail, you'll need to update to a non-vunerable version of SSL and compile apache24 from ports
 

Kaitux

Dabbler
Joined
Jun 9, 2016
Messages
19
thx Joshua for the tip, but i didnt help me.
I tried it again with installing nextcloud in a new jail with freshports.

i installed lighttpd and nextcloud both via freshports (drkk installation - fast and easy setup for testing)

after everything configurated and updated

# /usr/local/sbin/lighttpd -v
lighttpd/1.4.41 (ssl) - a light and fast webserver
Build-Date: Aug 18 2016 01:23:39


i got still the CVE-2016-2107 vulnerability...
whats wrong with the setup?
you need more information?
 

Joshua Parker Ruehlig

Hall of Famer
Joined
Dec 5, 2011
Messages
5,949
I didn't explain all the details.
you need to compile whatever is doing SSL with the option "WITH_OPENSSL_PORT"

here's an explanation
serverfault.com/a/589867
 

Kaitux

Dabbler
Joined
Jun 9, 2016
Messages
19
btw: i got a warning during the compilation telling me:

Using WITH_OPENSSL_PORT in make.conf is deprecated, replace it with DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=ssl=openssl in your make.conf

so guess DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=ssl=openssl should work as well...
 

Jailer

Not strong, but bad
Joined
Sep 12, 2014
Messages
4,977
btw: i got a warning during the compilation telling me:

Using WITH_OPENSSL_PORT in make.conf is deprecated, replace it with DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=ssl=openssl in your make.conf

so guess DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=ssl=openssl should work as well...
Correct.
 

Jailer

Not strong, but bad
Joined
Sep 12, 2014
Messages
4,977

Allan Wilmath

Explorer
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Messages
99
Why would you run a webserver on your fileserver? Since Jails use the same kernel and memory space as everything else, they are not as secure as it first seems. Also, virtualizing would allow you to do backups of your web server, and offer a little more security as well. Likely there is a Docker consenter for a web server that would have made this whole thread pointless, you just restart the container and it would have updated on it's own.

Just some things to consider.
 

Jailer

Not strong, but bad
Joined
Sep 12, 2014
Messages
4,977
Why would you run a webserver on your fileserver?
Because they can.
Also, virtualizing would allow you to do backups of your web server, and offer a little more security as well
And add overhead in the process as well.
Likely there is a Docker consenter for a web server that would have made this whole thread pointless
So go start a tutorial thread on how to install and set up docker and stop crapping on this thread. If you have something constructive to add please do.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top