I think it's mostly because I have done wrong things , especially with TrueCharts dockers. I have supposed it was just a Debian distrib plus TrueNAS on top but it's more complicated.Wow, I'm looking to build and test out a SCALE also to upgrade my aging CORE server from 2013, but those bugs sound annoying.
And of course, there is the cost issue as well. Thank you for your inputLikely because the lowest CPU in the product stack is enough for a NAS. In earlier generations, the recommendation was a Core i3.
Yes, the cost drive my choice. It's the cheapest CPU if you want the best performance of this motherboard, and it's enough for my needs.And of course, there is the cost issue as well. Thank you for your input
# badblocks -wsv -b 4096 /dev/device
Are you using some special thing to check temps or just smartctl?The system is quieter that way. But I haven't been able to experiment in all conditions yet because I finished testing the disks remotely, I'm not going home until the end of this week. The disk temperature were between 32 ans 40 °C during badblocks run, during files transfer it's now between 29°C and 36 °C.
That's interesting. I personally prefer CORE UI over SCALE UI as it requires more clicks to get to the more embedded menus. I feel it's just more usable. It's annoying to see nothing but empty space on the left menu items especially because I have a large 4k monitor. I suppose the embedded menus work better for people with smaller screens. Perhaps iXSystems should make the menu arrangements a choice between CORE style and SCALE style so people can choose their preference.Everything is in order. I upgraded to Bluefin, it's more complete and pleasant as an interface! The S.M.A.R.T. bug on the boot SSD is gone.
The new icons are lovely though!That's interesting. I personally prefer CORE UI over SCALE UI as it requires more clicks to get to the more embedded menus. I feel it's just more usable. It's annoying to see nothing but empty space on the left menu items especially because I have a large 4k monitor. I suppose the embedded menus work better for people with smaller screens. Perhaps iXSystems should make the menu arrangements a choice between CORE style and SCALE style so people can choose their preference.
Wow, I just now noticed that the icons are different after you mentioned it. Dashboard also uses smaller less-readable fonts and there are more darker colors on dark background that lack contrast making it also harder to see. Why? These changes seem less usable and less accessible design choice. I wonder if they actually audit their web UI for ADA compliance.The new icons are lovely though!
Yeah, looking at the SCALE documentation I have the impression that a few things are harder to access than in CORE (SCALE share's ACL looks strange imho). Might just be habit though.But yeah.... I still like CORE menus better.
No, I just read it in the TrueNAS interface. As I understand it, it's based on smartctl.Are you using some special thing to check temps or just smartctl?
I haven't tried CORE, I thought it was the same interface excepted for non implemented functions.I personally prefer CORE UI over SCALE UI as it requires more clicks to get to the more embedded menus.
Oh, thank you for that. Much appreciated.May I suggest you joeschmuck's script? It's wonderful for keeping track of your drives.
![]()
Multi_report.sh version for Core and Scale
This resource was originally created by user: @joeschmuck on the TrueNAS Community Forums Archive. https://www.truenas.com/community/resources/multi_report-sh-version-for-core-and-scale.179/download Multi-Report Tool to chart and record statistical data on your drives. This will email the...www.truenas.com
Services and Shell, which I tend to check somewhat often is hidden behind a menu instead of on the top menu.Yeah, looking at the SCALE documentation I have the impression that a few things are harder to access than in CORE (SCALE share's ACL looks strange imho). Might just be habit though.
UI is similar with similar menu items, but laid out very differently.I haven't tried CORE, I thought it was the same interface excepted for non implemented functions.
But I agree that it's not very accessible.