unreadable (pending) sectors

Status
Not open for further replies.

massmux

Dabbler
Joined
Mar 11, 2018
Messages
41
Hello i am getting these errors in a very new 10 disk freenas.

Mar 24 18:48:13 stor134 smartd[2679]: Device: /dev/ada4, 40 Currently unreadable (pending) sectors
Mar 24 19:18:13 stor134 smartd[2679]: Device: /dev/ada4, 104 Currently unreadable (pending) sectors (changed +64)
Mar 24 19:48:13 stor134 smartd[2679]: Device: /dev/ada4, 352 Currently unreadable (pending) sectors (changed +248)
Mar 24 20:18:13 stor134 smartd[2679]: Device: /dev/ada4, 2984 Currently unreadable (pending) sectors (changed +2632)

i am running smartctl -t long /dev/ada4
how is it possible such errors on a new disk array (raidz2) with a freenas running since few days?
have i to worry?
 

Ericloewe

Server Wrangler
Moderator
Joined
Feb 15, 2014
Messages
20,194

danb35

Hall of Famer
Joined
Aug 16, 2011
Messages
15,504
Bad sectors are always a bad thing. Rapidly-increasing counts of bad sectors are a very bad thing. That disk is dead, or at least mostly dead. Did you test it (and the other disk in your pool) before you created your pool?
 

massmux

Dabbler
Joined
Mar 11, 2018
Messages
41
yes i've checked before, but as Eric said, they dont care so much. In any case the mentioned disk has failed as expected and i succedeed in replacing.

i have another one in which there are about 100 unreadable sectors, that i hope will last until i can change this disk too
 

danb35

Hall of Famer
Joined
Aug 16, 2011
Messages
15,504
yes i've checked before, but as Eric said, they don't care so much.
Certainly a disk can fail at any time, but it's pretty unusual for a new disk that's gone through any sort of decent burn-in and testing (minimally, SMART test, badblocks, another SMART test). And for two of them to be going out at the same time under those circumstances is highly unusual--the only time I've seen something like that is when I bought a batch of "white label" hard drives.
 

massmux

Dabbler
Joined
Mar 11, 2018
Messages
41
yes you're right. infact i am quite upset. this was a purchase of 20 toshiba
 

danb35

Hall of Famer
Joined
Aug 16, 2011
Messages
15,504
Yes, some people have had success with that technique when there's a small number of unreadable sectors, even if I don't trust it myself. But you don't have "a small number of unreadable sectors".
 

joeschmuck

Old Man
Moderator
Joined
May 28, 2011
Messages
10,995
My opinion would be to take all of those drives you purchased and run badblocks on them. Burn them in properly. A SMART Long test is a read only test, it's not good enough.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top