JetForMe
Dabbler
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2020
- Messages
- 16
Almost all of posts on the forum recommending drives are from 2016 or earlier. The general recommendation from TrueNAS is WD Red Plus. But I found a couple of posts online talking about how WD snuck in SMR in some of their Red drives (hence the creation of "Plus" to distinguish CMR drives), and how they branded drives as 5400 rpm that were actually 7200 rpm (with higher power and thermal requirements).
blog.westerndigital.com
The new drives are "Plus," and the Plus series drive model numbers now end in slightly different letters:
8 TByte: WD80EFBX (-68AZZN0) instead of WD80EFAX (-68KNBN0)
10 TByte: WD101EFBX (-68B0AN0) instead of WD101EFAX (-68LDBN0)
12 Tbytes: WD120EFBX (-68B0EN0) instead of WD120EFAX (-68UNTN0)
14 TByte: WD140EFGX (-68B0GN0) instead of WD140EFFX (-68VBXN0)
(see https://www.extremetech.com/extreme...-its-reported-drive-speeds-to-reflect-reality)
The TrueNAS Mini page specifies recommended drives but excludes WD Red Plus 8 TB drives. Is there a reason for this?
Lastly, Newegg prices for 6TB drives are HIGHER than for 8 TB drives. Is there something better about the 6 than the 8?
Thanks!

On WD Red NAS Drives - Western Digital Corporate Blog
On WD Red NAS Drives - Data - Western Digital Corporate Blog

The new drives are "Plus," and the Plus series drive model numbers now end in slightly different letters:
8 TByte: WD80EFBX (-68AZZN0) instead of WD80EFAX (-68KNBN0)
10 TByte: WD101EFBX (-68B0AN0) instead of WD101EFAX (-68LDBN0)
12 Tbytes: WD120EFBX (-68B0EN0) instead of WD120EFAX (-68UNTN0)
14 TByte: WD140EFGX (-68B0GN0) instead of WD140EFFX (-68VBXN0)
(see https://www.extremetech.com/extreme...-its-reported-drive-speeds-to-reflect-reality)
The TrueNAS Mini page specifies recommended drives but excludes WD Red Plus 8 TB drives. Is there a reason for this?
Lastly, Newegg prices for 6TB drives are HIGHER than for 8 TB drives. Is there something better about the 6 than the 8?
Thanks!