indivision
Guru
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2013
- Messages
- 806
I do believe everyone in its own way make a good point: FreeNas's core isn't about plugins although, if those were better mantained and updated, everyone would benefit from it. But one thing is ask for it to be done, different is to expect it to be done.
The OS's job is to be reliable, stable and secure. If you ask me, it does this job pretty well.
I think that it comes down to clarity. If someone only needs a stable file server, there are a zillion ways to get there. If someone wants the convenience of a plugin system, that might be a bigger factor than the file system. Plus, they may have relied on the update speed that FreeNAS previously delivered.
It's not a crime if FreeNAS wants to focus on being a file server and put little effort in keeping the plugins updated. Clearly, that would be ok with some people. But, it should be made clear up front so that people can make a good decision for themselves.
As was pointed out earlier, Plex is so out of date that it doesn't even work with some client devices. If that is no big deal, as some old-time members suggest, just make that clear. It's confusing to advertise and document a plugin system and have people install and use the system only to find out that they can't rely on it to work.