Xeon E3-1230V5 or E3-1260LV5

Status
Not open for further replies.

Plato

Contributor
Joined
Mar 24, 2016
Messages
101
Hi,

I was building a new server with Xeon E3 chipset, but now I'm in a dilemma.. The CPU I ordered is now out of stock ( E3-1230V6 ).. I searched the market and found 2 used CPUs compatible with the motherboard which are cheaper than the 1230V6. I checked the benchmarks, and they look about same. Which one would you suggest to use in FreeNas?
 

HoneyBadger

actually does care
Administrator
Moderator
iXsystems
Joined
Feb 6, 2014
Messages
5,112
Of those two, the E3-1230v5 for the higher clock speeds.

But what is your end goal/use case for this server? Both will be pretty heavy lifters, and have way more power than you need unless you intend to run a lot of CPU-heavy jails eg: multiple Plex streams.
 

SavageAUS

Patron
Joined
Jul 9, 2016
Messages
418
I have the E3 1230 and have never had any issues running anything on my server. Plex as a use case works flawlessly with a couple of concurrent streams.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Plato

Contributor
Joined
Mar 24, 2016
Messages
101
Well, I'll use it for torrent / jdownloader2 / usenet / plex / sickrage..

I was using Atom C2750 before.. It was enough for almost anything except re-coding 4K content..

As you can see from the usage it'll not be heavily loaded.. While I think 1230v5 is better because single thread speed is faster, 1260Lv5 is better because TDP is lower than 1230v5 and in the long run the electricity cost would be better for 1260Lv5 I think...

I'm not sure but I think Plex is re-coding 4K content with multi-threading, and 1260Lv5 turbo speed ( 3,9 GHz ) is higher than 1230v5 (3,8 GHz)..

So, what do you think?
 

anmnz

Patron
Joined
Feb 17, 2018
Messages
286

Ender117

Patron
Joined
Aug 20, 2018
Messages
219
Mind you, I have tired transcode with dual E5 2690 v2 and it can barely do 1-2 4K HEVC streams. Although newer E3s have avx2 I still don't believe it can do 4k transcode smoothly
 

jgreco

Resident Grinch
Joined
May 29, 2011
Messages
18,680
As you can see from the usage it'll not be heavily loaded.. While I think 1230v5 is better because single thread speed is faster, 1260Lv5 is better because TDP is lower than 1230v5 and in the long run the electricity cost would be better for 1260Lv5 I think...

I'm not sure but I think Plex is re-coding 4K content with multi-threading, and 1260Lv5 turbo speed ( 3,9 GHz ) is higher than 1230v5 (3,8 GHz)..

So, what do you think?

I think you're wrong.

The idle power consumption of the 1230v5 and 1260Lv5 should be virtually identical. So when the platform isn't doing anything, you're not saving anything, not power, not heat.

One of the biggest differentiators is the hobbling of the turbo in the L processors. It's dialed back very aggressively. Intel hasn't made good information available about this for the E3 v5's, but here's the E5 v3 chart

https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/processors/xeon/xeon-e5-v3-spec-update.html

Over on page 9. So the instant you hit a second core running, both are likely to drop in speed fairly substantially. The 1230v5 is likely to be a better performer under load.
 

Donny Davis

Contributor
Joined
Jul 31, 2015
Messages
139
I just snagged up an E3-1270 v6 for its single thread performance in my machine. Got it on ebay for 220 bucks.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top