madsci1016
Dabbler
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2022
- Messages
- 12
I have two full up Scale installs at home. One will eventually go offsite. The main machine has replication jobs to the 'remote' machine for all my datasets, which are encrypted.
In the meantime i want to reorganize the disk layout of my main pool on my main machine (mirror pairs to raidz2). I assume that means destroying the pool (make sure to move system pool) creating a new pool with the new arrangement, and pulling back my datasets from the 'remote' machines.
But i'm trying to test this first. I can't just click recover in the replication task or create a pull task from scratch without error. I point it to a empty local dataset to dump into and i get the error "Unable to send encrypted dataset 'RemoteMainPool/OffsiteHDD' to existing unencrypted or unrelated dataset 'MainPool/Test"
So i guess i'm at a loss, how is recovery from an "offsite " replicated encrypted dataset to a fresh local machine (assuming the disaster destroyed the original) suppose to work exactly, since the new pool will never be not "unrelated". Is it suppose to be just unlock the remote data set locally(at the remote) and rsync back to a new machine?
Tried googling this but wasn't finding a clear answer.
In the meantime i want to reorganize the disk layout of my main pool on my main machine (mirror pairs to raidz2). I assume that means destroying the pool (make sure to move system pool) creating a new pool with the new arrangement, and pulling back my datasets from the 'remote' machines.
But i'm trying to test this first. I can't just click recover in the replication task or create a pull task from scratch without error. I point it to a empty local dataset to dump into and i get the error "Unable to send encrypted dataset 'RemoteMainPool/OffsiteHDD' to existing unencrypted or unrelated dataset 'MainPool/Test"
So i guess i'm at a loss, how is recovery from an "offsite " replicated encrypted dataset to a fresh local machine (assuming the disaster destroyed the original) suppose to work exactly, since the new pool will never be not "unrelated". Is it suppose to be just unlock the remote data set locally(at the remote) and rsync back to a new machine?
Tried googling this but wasn't finding a clear answer.