Stux
MVP
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2016
- Messages
- 4,419
1.33 TB free of 1.79 TB, Mike
Oh dear.
You have no redundancy, your two 1TB disks are striped not mirrored.
When the drive fails that is failing, it'll probably take the whole array with it.
1.33 TB free of 1.79 TB, Mike
Hmmm.... I just view the volumes and it reports it as healthy. Maybe a couple of bad blocks do not change this? Mike
OK, I'm assuming you're in the US, since the time zone in your SMART reports was CDT. With that assumption, the details:You might want to consider a new system, which you should be able to do for about $500. More details later.
...which I don't think there's a way to do on a UFS volume.It reports as healthy because its never checked the health.
No, bad blocks won't change that--the volume status will show "healthy" until a disk drops offline.Hmmm.... I just view the volumes and it reports it as healthy. Maybe a couple of bad blocks do not change this? Mike
...which I don't think there's a way to do on a UFS volume.
OK, I'm assuming you're in the US, since the time zone in your SMART reports was CDT. With that assumption, the details:
Done. Without shipping, $496. Set the disks up as a ZFS mirror, configure email alerts, schedule regular short and long SMART self-tests and scrubs. You'll have a stable, secure place for your data, which will regularly confirm that the data's in good shape, and alert you if there are any problems
- Start with the Proliant ML10 I mentioned earlier. $190.
- Add an 8 GB stick of RAM. $92 A 16 GB stick for $165 wouldn't be a bad idea, but probably not necessary.
- Add two 2 TB disks (yes, you can still get 1 TB, but the cost delta is so low that it really doesn't seem worth it). $90 each.
- Add a small SSD for a boot device (yes, you can still use USB sticks, but the SSD is faster, more reliable, and still cheap). $34
Agreed, on both counts.You can still schedule SMART testing on a UFS disk. I see no evidence that SMART tests have ever been run, other than just now.
Agreed. @Mike Zahorik, you should work on backing up your data. Like now. Like today, if you can. As @Stux says, when that drive fully fails (which it's trying to do), you'll lose all the data on that volume.But what I do know is that the storage is Raid 0 with one very unhappy drive
Well..... thanks for the ideas, but $500 probably will not pass muster with the SSA check. How about just replacing the 1TB drive with a new one? I found Tiger Direct can send me one for $50. Then should I correct this stripe to mirror? Mike
Yeah, I hadn't seen his response with the disk usage, but he has 1.33 TB free, not used. So that would allow a mirror of 1 TB disks to work, though it'd be pretty full. A mirror of 2 TB disks would be only about 35% full.Currently OP has 1.33TB of data, so will need the 2TB disks. Even then, that's only 25% free. It would certainly be worth thinking about larger drives still.
"Currently OP has 1.33 TB data?", no I have 1.33 TB of free space. Mike
OK, if I did purchase two new 2TB drives, what should I look for? I generally go with seagate stuff. I read somewhere that maybe I should use a 5400 rpm rather than 7200 rpm. I suspect that the largest cach would be good. What else should I consider? Mike
I have a 500GB portable drive that I could copy all the data to. Then start fresh? Mike
At a bare minimum, you'll need two mirrored 1 TB disks in your system. But that will be pretty full, which is rarely a good thing--I'd really recommend 2 x 2 TB instead. And there's no way (that I know of) to turn UFS RAID0 into UFS RAID1.How about just replacing the 1TB drive with a new one? I found Tiger Direct can send me one for $50.
There's nothing wrong with 7200 rpm disks, but they don't really do anything for you, they tend to cost more than 5400 rpm, they draw more power, and they tend to run warmer. Your disk temps are fine, and with two disks, power isn't a major concern either. If there isn't a cost difference, you might as well use the 7200 rpm disks, but if there is, go for the cheaper ones. You'll find the WD Red disks are the most popular around here, but Seagate NAS (which I guess they've now branded as Ironwolf) are fine as well.OK, if I did purchase two new 2TB drives, what should I look for? I generally go with seagate stuff. I read somewhere that maybe I should use a 5400 rpm rather than 7200 rpm.