SMB4.CONF double entries

[stefanb]

Hi,

I had an issue with slow browsing CIFS shares.
I tried to fix it with the additional parms from cyberjock:

Code:

    ea support = no
    store dos attributes = no
    map archive = no
    map hidden = no
    map readonly = no
    map system = no
    veto files = /._*/.DS_Store/
    delete veto files = yes
    hide dot files = yes

I took a look into the smb4.conf. There are now two entries for "ea support/store dos attributes".
First both values are set to yes, and in the second entry to no.

Code:

    ...
    ea support = yes
    store dos attributes = yes
    lm announce = yes
    time server = yes
    acl allow execute always = true
    dos filemode = yes
    multicast dns register = yes
    domain logons = no
    local master = yes
    idmap config *: backend = tdb
    idmap config *: range = 90000001-100000000
    server role = standalone
    netbios name = FILER
    workgroup = THAVIS
    security = user
    pid directory = /var/run/samba
    create mask = 0660
    directory mask = 0770
    client ntlmv2 auth = yes
    dos charset = CP850
    unix charset = UTF-8
    log level = 1
    ea support = no
    store dos attributes = no
    map archive = no
    map hidden = no
    map readonly = no
    map system = no
    veto files = /._*/.DS_Store/
    delete veto files = yes
    hide dot files = yes

Will this be a problem? How can I fix it? I think the UI will recreate the smb4.conf so manually changing has no "stable" effect.

Regards
Stefan

 

[dlavigne]

How did you add the additional parameters (editing the file or using the GUI)?

What is the exact build version (from System -> Information)?

 

[anodos]

No, it won't be a problem. Samba will only use the last value for the parameter listed in the [share] or [global] section.

 

[stefanb]

Hi,

it's FreeNAS-9.3-STABLE-201605170422.
All changes were made using the GUI.

Regards
Stefan

 

[anodos]

Hi,

it's FreeNAS-9.3-STABLE-201605170422.
All changes were made using the GUI.

Regards
Stefan

Yes, this is the way it works when adding those auxiliary parameters. It is not a problem.

 

[stefanb]

OK, thanks