Based off what an earlier commenter said, I wouldn't recommend it. Sounds like this version is less tolerant of low memory setups.Will it work in 8GB RAM? My new skylake is currently waiting, and old machine is poor indeed.
Based off what an earlier commenter said, I wouldn't recommend it. Sounds like this version is less tolerant of low memory setups.Will it work in 8GB RAM? My new skylake is currently waiting, and old machine is poor indeed.
System requirements should not change dramatically. All depends on expected load. For example, RAM usage for L2ARC headers in 9.10 is even twice lower. Though the more memory is always better.Will it work in 8GB RAM? My new skylake is currently waiting, and old machine is poor indeed.
Original developers goal was to double maximal L2ARC size on system with 60GB RAM, but opposite is also possible. Though while idnexing overhead is the most strict factor here, there are others. For example, if too small ARC trashed too often, it may be unable to properly identify frequently used blocks to fill L2ARC efficiently. But that even more depends on specific workload to predict.With 9.3 we did not even think about using L2ARC below 64 GB of RAM due to the indexing overhead. Does that mean that 9.10 might drop this threshold to 32 GB?
Thanks! 4 me it's important just to migrate and perform a first launch to have working config, next I'll change hardware to 16 GB & skylake.System requirements should not change dramatically. All depends on expected load. For example, RAM usage for L2ARC headers in 9.10 is even twice lower. Though the more memory is always better.
Now there is samba43-4.3.4_100116.will you manage to pull in Samba 4.3.6 prior to releasing?
Now there is samba43-4.3.4_100116.
Perhaps someone should update the release notes
http://download.freenas.org/9.10/MASTER/201603210530/ReleaseNotes
Says 4.1.17
Does this mean samba 4 is part of this version and can handle GPOs too?I'd check /var/log/samba4/log.smbd
Samba 4 has been a part of freenas for a while. As far as GPO goes, in theory you can use rsat to create GPOs for a samba4 domain. I haven't tried this myself soi can't testify as to whether it works or how well it works.Does this mean samba 4 is part of this version and can handle GPOs too?
Sorry for quoting myself, but I got it to perform quite good.Has anyone tested/optimized Intel x550's (10GBe) yet? It works but its relatively slow (~250 MB/s)
I have 3 entries that won't delete like that "FreNAS 3bbdebla bla bla long string of numbers and letters"Has anyone tried to delete earlier 9.10 boot partitions? On the system I've been testing it on, I can delete the 9.3 partition but not any of the 9.10 tests, as shown in attached. If not just me, I can file a bug report but thought it worth the general query first.