1 Currently unreadable (pending) sectors

Status
Not open for further replies.

SweetAndLow

Sweet'NASty
Joined
Nov 6, 2013
Messages
6,421
Is the reliability any worse than a new drive?
Not really something to worry about. It will have run hours but should be mostly brand new. Might even be better than a new drive because they already fixed the broken part.
 

Brezlord

Contributor
Joined
Jan 7, 2017
Messages
189
I'm a virgin when it comes to RMAing a drive. It's the first drive I've had fail inside of the warranty period.
 

Ericloewe

Server Wrangler
Moderator
Joined
Feb 15, 2014
Messages
20,175
I actually received a drive that is indistinguishable from a new one. It might be new, it might not be, but it's labeled exactly like a new drive.
 

Chris Moore

Hall of Famer
Joined
May 2, 2015
Messages
10,080
As an experiment I've taken the drive off line and am wiping the drive by filling it with zeros which should force the drive to reallocate the bad sector. I'll do some tests and if they pass I'll re-slither the drive and see what happens.
If the drive is still under warranty, get it replaced. You should not wait. You should not see a single bad or reallocated sector in the life of the drive.
 

Chris Moore

Hall of Famer
Joined
May 2, 2015
Messages
10,080
The next question I have is, when you get a drive replaced under warranty do drive manufactures issue you a new drive or is it just a reconditioned drive?
I have sent in 6TB WD Red Pro drives and the drives I got back looked exactly like new ones, but when I sent in 4TB Red Pro drives, the replacements came back labeled as re-manufactured. The drives all looked and worked like new.
Do test all the drives you get, new or replacement, before you put them into the pool.
Like @SweetAndLow , I also keep a couple spare drives on standby. Better safe than sorry.
 
Joined
Apr 9, 2015
Messages
1,258
Yep, test, test, test, when you get a replacement. The one bad thing is that the warranty period is a continuation of the original drive so if you have a 3 year warranty and you RMA after 1 year then the replacement has two years of warranty available.

Also make sure that you package the drive correctly. The drives I purchased from NewEgg were shipped in their own boxes from the factory in a larger box with a couple "air bags" to take up the excess space. Not only did I repack the drive back into it's ORIGINAL packaging I resealed the anti-static bag and included a copy of the smart report with the issue highlighted. The small box was then wrapped in bubble wrap and boxed for shipping. The RMA said something like an inch of "foam" but I believe that would have been for a bare drive. And INSURE the drive for what it will cost to replace it that way the carrier is on the hook if it's dropped and heavily damaged or lost or whatever else could happen while they have it. I think the 150 insurance on the one I sent USPS was an extra 3 bucks. Maybe my methods are a little overkill but I would rather be safe than sorry in getting the replacement sent.

Sadly I have now been waiting about 43 hours for the return shipment's tracking information to actually work.....
 

Chris Moore

Hall of Famer
Joined
May 2, 2015
Messages
10,080
Because forcing a write to the bad sector will cause the drive to reallocate the bad sector. It will no longer be a pending sector, and the SMART test will (probably) pass, so it will look like everything's OK.
The thing I normally do is replace the 'failing' drive with a previously burned in drive and then take the drive with the bad/reallocated sector to another system where I run a burn-in test again. After the test, most of the drives I have dealt with, will have hundreds or even thousands more bad sectors and that pretty definitively decides their fate. I did have a drive that cleared the single pending sector and looked healthy after and I put it back in service, but that was one drive out of dozens that survived the retest.
 

Brezlord

Contributor
Joined
Jan 7, 2017
Messages
189
I carried out a relocate bad block operation and that worked but as soon as I did another long SMART to I got another bad sector. Drive is on its way to WD RMA.

SMART Self-test log structure revision number 1
Num Test_Description Status Remaining LifeTime(hours) LBA_of_first_error
# 1 Extended offline Completed: read failure 90% 5925 112903280
# 2 Conveyance offline Completed without error 00% 5925 -
# 3 Short offline Completed without error 00% 5925 -
# 4 Short offline Aborted by host 10% 5917 -
# 5 Extended offline Completed: read failure 90% 5912 112953656
# 6 Short offline Completed: read failure 90% 5910 112953656
# 7 Short offline Completed: read failure 90% 5903 112953656
# 8 Short offline Completed without error 00% 5535 -
 

Stux

MVP
Joined
Jun 2, 2016
Messages
4,358
Is the reliability any worse than a new drive?

Back in the bad old Seagate days, when I had Seagate drives falling constantly they’d send me refurbished drives and half the time they’d die early or instantly.

But I don’t think that is the case these days.

The problem I suspect was “is testing good, slap a label on and send it out”

Of course just because it tests good doesn’t mean it wasn’t actually subtly bad
 

Brezlord

Contributor
Joined
Jan 7, 2017
Messages
189
I'm going to replace the failed drive with a new one that has already been burnt in. When I get the RMA replacement I'll do the suggested burn in test using the solnet-array-test script and if it passes the disk will just sit on the shelf as a spare and hope the RMA drive wont fail when I need to use it.
 

Brezlord

Contributor
Joined
Jan 7, 2017
Messages
189
I thought that I would post an update. I sent the failed drive back to WD as per RMA instructions. In Australia the drive had to be sent to Vietnam at a postage cost of $29.79AUD no tracking, if I wanted tracking it would of cost just over $100 more than half the cost of the drive, not worth it. I sent it on 28.10.17 and I got it back today 5.12.17, that's 36 days. You would not want to be depending on that drive. As people have stated it is a must to have a spare burnt in drive ready to go. I am currently running the solnet array test. Hopefully it all goes well.
 

Chris Moore

Hall of Famer
Joined
May 2, 2015
Messages
10,080
I sent it on 28.10.17 and I got it back today 5.12.17, that's 36 days.
Wow. Yes, that is quite a while to wait. Here in the US, I usually get a drive back from warranty in a couple weeks at most. Even so, I keep spares ready so I don't have to wait at all to replace a failed drive. I had some drives in one of my servers that were still running after 5 years of service and I replaced them with new drives in an attempt to prevent any sudden, unexpected failures, and when I bought the new drives, I went up from 2TB to 4TB. Maintenance can sometimes be an opportunity to get an upgrade.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top