Intel Desktop CT or DELL Broadcom 5722 ?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Chicken76

Dabbler
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
46
Intel. If you really want performance, consider a Intel Server Adapter I210-T1 as a minimum.
Would an ET Dual Port Server Adapter be much better?
It's available where I live but it's not that attractive to me because: first it's more than five times more expensive than a Desktop CT and second, drivers have stopped at Windows Server 2012 / Win8 level. No R2/8.1 or newer, and I'd hate to sink money into outdated hardware. (The CT is in the same boat driver-wise but at least it's decently priced)

Is the desktop adapter not able to fill the gigabit link with iSCSI traffic?

How would you rate the on-board I217?
 

MrToddsFriends

Documentation Browser
Joined
Jan 12, 2015
Messages
1,338
Related question: Would a HP E0X95AA (I210-T1 based) be a good choice for FreeNAS? Experiences, objections?

http://h30094.www3.hp.com/product/sku/10712400/mfg_partno/E0X95AA

It's relatively inexpensive for a I210-T1 NIC. I'm using one in my Windows desktop PC because the onboard NIC died but I didn't try it in my NAS so far.
 

Ericloewe

Server Wrangler
Moderator
Joined
Feb 15, 2014
Messages
20,194
How would you rate the on-board I217?
-V or -LM? One of them is not officially supported under FreeBSD and has been known to occasionally cause issues (though I think the driver was updated to fix this).
 

Chicken76

Dabbler
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
46
-V or -LM? One of them is not officially supported under FreeBSD and has been known to occasionally cause issues (though I think the driver was updated to fix this).
It doesn't say. The machine in question is a Dell PowerEdge T20 with a single gigabit NIC.
This is what is says in the description:
Integrated Intel I217 Gigabit Ethernet LAN 10/100/1000
And here's the relevant section from this pdf:

3H6UZAG.png
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top