OMFG! Awesome (Kentucky Way).
Okay at one point I had a customer who was interested in a hardware design done here in shop, but the CEO "knew a company" (drinking buddies?) and had them do the hardware instead. This was 2006-2007 era IIRC, and it was Opteron stuff. These things started dropping like flies, and the guy tasked with operating them pulled one apart to show me one day. The heat sink grease had been just totally glopped on, had smooshed out from between the CPU and heatsink, and formed a little halo around the CPU socket on the serverboard. It was still real thick in between the CPU and heatsink, which of course is a problem for heat transfer.
I wish I had had a camera at the time, but ... secure facility and all that.
Now I know there's a lot of debate about the best way to apply heat sink grease. Some observations:
1) Applying it very wrong is bad.
2) If you're overclocking, you want the best possible application. But no one here is doing that.
3) The general consensus is that the pea method is mostly OK except when you're supposed to use the vertical line, which is often these days.
4) But the process that works for every CPU is actually what Arctic Silver calls the surface spread. This is hard to do right until you've done it a bunch of times. It has the added benefit of additional surface contact between the CPU and heatsink, but also has the potential for air bubbles especially if you are sloppy. That's part of the reason AS doesn't suggest it for most cases ... but in a shop environment it is preferable because there's less opportunity for someone to use the "wrong method."
5) As long as you've made a good attempt to do a good job, don't have a heatsink that's too small, and aren't doing dumb things, the specific application technique used probably isn't going to impact you. Pea, vertical line, surface spread... follow the directions for ANY of them and you're probably going to be just fine. This really only comes into play for the people doing overclocking or other silly things.