Hi,
So I have a X10SL7-F / Xeon E3-1231V3 / 32GB Crucial ECC Unbuffered DDR3 SeaSonic 650 PSU, 8x 6TB (WD RED) with a Node 804 box - great case.
I have a N40L as a backup box right now & have been agonizing over getting another backup box.
Is ZFS in a raidz1 or raidz2 CPU intensive? My thought is either to:
Option 1:
1. Put 4x 6tb drives in a raidz1 in the N40L & be done (gives me 1 freenas backup box but it is limited)
2. Get another X10SL7-F with another Node 804 case & put 12x 2tb drives in it in Raidz2
Option 2:
1. Get Node 304 with X10SL7-F & a G3220 CPU, put the 4x 6tb drives in Raidz1 (better cooling than N40L)
2. Retire the N40L all together
Option 3:
1. Leave 6x 2tb drives in N40L (current state)
2. Get Node 304 with X10SL7-F & a G3220 CPU, put the 4x 6tb drives in Raidz1 (better cooling than N40L)
Option 4:
1. Leave 6x 2tb drives in N40L (current state)
2. Get something better than my current "main box" in sig.
My thought is that I want 1 box as the main machine & I think 2 backups is good. If I am going full freenas & getting rid of all local storage beyond the boot drives, I want redundancy.
Any thoughts or opinions? I would like it to be compatible with Freenas 10 (whenever it comes out).
My main box is primarily a file dump, backup, afp backup, esxi storage. No real VM's running on it though (not often). I keep thinking how much money I would be willing to spend to recover any lost data & if it costs me another $1000 or so to make another backup box then so be it.
Thanks,
Rich
So I have a X10SL7-F / Xeon E3-1231V3 / 32GB Crucial ECC Unbuffered DDR3 SeaSonic 650 PSU, 8x 6TB (WD RED) with a Node 804 box - great case.
I have a N40L as a backup box right now & have been agonizing over getting another backup box.
Is ZFS in a raidz1 or raidz2 CPU intensive? My thought is either to:
Option 1:
1. Put 4x 6tb drives in a raidz1 in the N40L & be done (gives me 1 freenas backup box but it is limited)
2. Get another X10SL7-F with another Node 804 case & put 12x 2tb drives in it in Raidz2
Option 2:
1. Get Node 304 with X10SL7-F & a G3220 CPU, put the 4x 6tb drives in Raidz1 (better cooling than N40L)
2. Retire the N40L all together
Option 3:
1. Leave 6x 2tb drives in N40L (current state)
2. Get Node 304 with X10SL7-F & a G3220 CPU, put the 4x 6tb drives in Raidz1 (better cooling than N40L)
Option 4:
1. Leave 6x 2tb drives in N40L (current state)
2. Get something better than my current "main box" in sig.
My thought is that I want 1 box as the main machine & I think 2 backups is good. If I am going full freenas & getting rid of all local storage beyond the boot drives, I want redundancy.
Any thoughts or opinions? I would like it to be compatible with Freenas 10 (whenever it comes out).
My main box is primarily a file dump, backup, afp backup, esxi storage. No real VM's running on it though (not often). I keep thinking how much money I would be willing to spend to recover any lost data & if it costs me another $1000 or so to make another backup box then so be it.
Thanks,
Rich