Email alerts from multiple FreeNAS servers in same network

Status
Not open for further replies.

Mlovelace

Guru
Joined
Aug 19, 2014
Messages
1,111
You are right about the burn in I should do that soon.

If they are the same product like you said , isn't it odd that intel would back off from any warranty on these ? If it was just the packaging it really wouldn't matter for the warranty.Never raised the suspicion in you about it ?
It's not odd at all. They sell OEM to other manufactures in bulk who in turn issue their own warranty on the product. The discount the 3rd party manufacturer receives from Intel offsets the their warranty RMA claims and then some.

If I were to have a CPU problem in one of my servers I would call HP about it not Intel. If the OEM in my NAS fails then I'm on the hook because I built it myself. I'm fine taking that on as I did a thorough burn-in when I received the components.
 

jgreco

Resident Grinch
Joined
May 29, 2011
Messages
18,680
You are right about the burn in I should do that soon.

If they are the same product like you said , isn't it odd that intel would back off from any warranty on these ? If it was just the packaging it really wouldn't matter for the warranty.Never raised the suspicion in you about it ?

Not at all. A vast majority of processors sold are sold by the tray. The simple fact is that Intel doesn't want to be in the dealing-with-end-users business, and CPU failures aren't a common thing. They recognize that there's a need for retail CPU's, but even there, they push hard for you to deal with your retail vendor, not Intel directly.

For tray CPU's, vendors such as Dell, HP, and IBM handle customer problems with whatever warranty terms they want to provide to their customers, and on the back side, they negotiate their own terms with Intel for "warranty" coverage, which may bear little resemblance to what's being offered to customers.

A lot of us smaller shops may buy tray CPU's as well, because often they offer parts that aren't available as retail. The distributor we've been buying Intel parts through offers a three month warranty on Intel parts. That's long enough for them to be shipped, received, stored in inventory for a few weeks, and then put into a system and burned in. The problem is I have no leverage to get that warranty extended more than that, so there's some risk there. Maybe I don't want to provide a year warranty on a system that a customer might then decide to take apart and mess with, because if I get a warranty claim at the six month mark and I can't prove it has been tampered with, then I'm out the replacement cost on the CPU. Depends on the profit margin and the customer, of course.

But anyways, Intel gets to avoid most of the drama that the hard drive manufacturers have to accept as part of their business, because CPU failures are relatively unusual - maybe one in a thousand. Even over time, the usual cause of failure would be thermal stresses or power issues, any other failure is damn rare.

So let me see if I can summarize this in a more easily understood manner. For tray CPU's, Intel's working with manufacturers and distributors that order these things by the thousands or tens of thousands. They most likely say something like "for failures, log the FPO/ATPO, then toss the failed chips in a box in the corner, and mail them back to us every few months, and we'll credit you for them." That's very attractive because it is a low drama sort of way to just get on with life.
 
Joined
Nov 11, 2014
Messages
1,174
First day testing E5-1620v2. I notice it doesn't go over 3.7 Ghz , all in bios by default , any ideas ?
 

depasseg

FreeNAS Replicant
Joined
Sep 16, 2014
Messages
2,874
Joined
Nov 11, 2014
Messages
1,174
Magic pixie dust? :)

I thought that was spec'd to support up to 3.7GHz. Sounds like you are there.

Not sure what you are saying , but is 3.7Ghz base clock and suppose to turbo to 3.9Ghz on all cores ?!
 

depasseg

FreeNAS Replicant
Joined
Sep 16, 2014
Messages
2,874
Joined
Nov 11, 2014
Messages
1,174
I am reading and trying to make sense out of it , but... what will work on single core if under 130W ?
 
Joined
Nov 11, 2014
Messages
1,174
I am trying to load one core with this Pi program from your link but still no result ?!
 
Joined
Nov 11, 2014
Messages
1,174
I load a single core with prime95 still no higher than 3.7 Ghz, that's not the reason.
 
Joined
Nov 11, 2014
Messages
1,174
I don't want to jump in to early conclusions but it seems my friends:

Intel "turbo" lie to us again !

Is this the "caveat" you were talking about ? Same thing like Intel SSD speeds.:(
 

jgreco

Resident Grinch
Joined
May 29, 2011
Messages
18,680
Not sure what you are saying , but is 3.7Ghz base clock and suppose to turbo to 3.9Ghz on all cores ?!

It's not going to turbo on all cores, probably just one. I'd bet it's like a 0/0/0/2 configuration. 3.7GHz is still a great speed and in the end is the more important one.
 
Joined
Nov 11, 2014
Messages
1,174
It's not going to turbo on all cores, probably just one. I'd bet it's like a 0/0/0/2 configuration. 3.7GHz is still a great speed and in the end is the more important one.

I just got misled by a pretty looking web site again. Can't tell who is right and wrong anymore , everybody is lying now.:smile:

You are right. 3.7 GHz is still a great speed, I wouldn't worry about that anymore.
 

Attachments

  • wrong web.PNG
    wrong web.PNG
    172.1 KB · Views: 247
  • right web.PNG
    right web.PNG
    43 KB · Views: 255
Joined
Nov 11, 2014
Messages
1,174
Computers are like girls? :)

Well they are too different to compare. At least we know which one is more reliable.:smile:
 
Joined
Nov 11, 2014
Messages
1,174
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top