Space Not Adding Up

Status
Not open for further replies.

Clinderw

Explorer
Joined
Aug 11, 2013
Messages
96
Hello,

Can anyone help explain this? I am expecting to have ~17 TiB of usable space but i only have 15.5 - anyone able to explain where the other 1.5 TiB went?

I have 2 RaidZ2 vdevs making up the pool.
upload_2015-10-6_19-33-13.png


upload_2015-10-6_19-34-0.png
 

Bidule0hm

Server Electronics Sorcerer
Joined
Aug 5, 2013
Messages
3,710
In fact you're supposed to have 21.8 TiB minus the overheads (17.2 is after the 80 % rule which is not accounted for in the GUI numbers) so you probably have some snapshots lowering your available space. Did you enable them?
 

gpsguy

Active Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2012
Messages
4,472
Did you remember to preformat the drives with the /xtratracks command? :confused:

Just kidding ... FreeNAS has some overhead, there's nothing you can do about it. Trust us, the numbers are correct.
 

Clinderw

Explorer
Joined
Aug 11, 2013
Messages
96
haha thanks for the quick replys. I trust the numbers are correct - just trying to understand what i'm losing space to and if it minimizable. It seems like a lot is falling out...

I haven't set up ongoing snapshots yet, i have 7GB of manually created ones. This is on my short list of things to set up.

Chris
 

danb35

Hall of Famer
Joined
Aug 16, 2011
Messages
15,504
If, as you say, you have two vdevs, each consisting of five disks in RAIDZ2 configuration, the net capacity of your pool will be about 6x that of a single disk, or 18 TB, or about 16 TiB. The remaining difference would be OS overhead and reserved space.
 

Clinderw

Explorer
Joined
Aug 11, 2013
Messages
96
Its a 6 drive vdev and a 4 drive vdev. If your saying there is ~2tb of overhead, any idea what the system is doing with all that space? Even if its not controllable, it's be nice to be a little more educated. Not trying to be thick or difficult.

Thanks
 

Bidule0hm

Server Electronics Sorcerer
Joined
Aug 5, 2013
Messages
3,710
Ah ok, two vdevs. Then it's normal, you just have 2x 2 drives for parity instead of only 2 drives with a one vdev pool so you actually have 4 + 2 drives for the data so 6x 3TB which is about 16.4 TiB so you have a bit less than 1 TB of overhead. Everything looks good ;)
 

Clinderw

Explorer
Joined
Aug 11, 2013
Messages
96
Thanks! I guess my calculations were a little off.

Might switch to just one vdev down the road...i think i might be a little overkill at the moment.

Thanks
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top