New pool with new drives and not faster

ondjultomte

Contributor
Joined
Aug 10, 2015
Messages
117
I had a old pool with 6x 4TB sata drives with no frills, fio benchmark below
Screenshot 2024-02-21 at 16.50.26.png

good write performance at around 400MBps old drives from 2016.

I got a new pool with 8x 10TB SAS drives which I get the worse from, its more uneven! in seq write that is.
Screenshot 2024-02-19 at 15.36.29.png

This is not expected, with drives that can read/write at 200MBps compared to 100 of the old sata drives I expeced to get more seq performance outof this new setup.

I need to ideas how to tweak or understand this behaviour better.



above
 

ondjultomte

Contributor
Joined
Aug 10, 2015
Messages
117
hardware on server is

SM x10srh
Xeon E5 2695v4
128GB ram

the old pool sits in a server with
Intel Xeon Silver 4108 (16) @ 3.000GHz
some dell MB
16GB ram
 
Last edited:

ondjultomte

Contributor
Joined
Aug 10, 2015
Messages
117
Its silly but look at each drive performing much better with to old sata sompared to the 10TB sas drives!

1708532900275.png
 

ondjultomte

Contributor
Joined
Aug 10, 2015
Messages
117
the new this which are on datasheet twice as fast are in reality twice as slow! ...
 

sretalla

Powered by Neutrality
Moderator
Joined
Jan 1, 2016
Messages
9,703
I notice a key difference is you added SLOG and L2ARC (in addition to the special VDEV).

Perhaps remove the SLOG and L2ARC first and retry your tests.
 

ondjultomte

Contributor
Joined
Aug 10, 2015
Messages
117
I notice a key difference is you added SLOG and L2ARC (in addition to the special VDEV).

Perhaps remove the SLOG and L2ARC first and retry your tests.
I could try that, but that should defenetly only just improve things if eg synced writes.
 

ondjultomte

Contributor
Joined
Aug 10, 2015
Messages
117
wow, adding the slog and l2arc made the old pool faster ! :)


600MBps
 
Top