Growing my first FreeNAS system: are these Bad Ideas (tm)?

Status
Not open for further replies.

rmavillarica

Cadet
Joined
Oct 9, 2017
Messages
5
Greetings from the Philippines!

I have done a bunch of reading and learning in this forum and hope these are not silly questions.

I am currently using RAID1 with Ubuntu on some old Atom hardware and a couple of 3TB WD Red drives. I am beginning to run out of space and thought I would bite the bullet to protect data and my wife's photos (about 300GB per year). I would like to use some of my old hardware. I currently have:
2 pcs - WD Red 3TB - One of them has an unusually high Load Cycle Count - 100k+, the other has nine (9!).
1 pc - WD Green 3TB - I will wdidle all of the Green drives.
1 pc - WD Green 2TB
2 pcs - WD Green 1TB
3 pcs - Seagate 5TB USB - I think these are the shingle type drives, so I don't intend to use these.
2 pcs - 32 Sandisk ReadyCache SSD drives
2 pcs - Sandisk Cruzer Fit 8GB USB flash drives

I would like to buy 8TB or 10TB WD Red drives to make up the balance, plus an extra one as a cold spare. The 8/10 decision will be based on Camelcamelcamel price monitoring in the next month, and is slightly coupled with the X11SSM-F/X11SSL-CF decision: do I use the SSDs as mirrors, or save the SATA ports and use a couple of USBs? Maybe it would be better to spend the extra $85 and SAS breakout cables on the X11SSL-CF motherboard?

If mirrored USB flash drives are safe, I am thinking of running a 6+2 (10TB and USB boot drives) RAIDZ2 with a Supermicro X11SSM-F motherboard or an 8+2 (8TB or 10TB) RAIDZ2 with a Supermicro X11SSL-CF motherboard. In the case of the X11SSL-CF, I would use the mirrored SSD drives to boot.

If I run 6+2 drives, the calculator says I should have 4.296 TiB usable initially. If I run 8+2 drives, I should have 5.728 TiB usable. I have a bunch of media on the three 5TB drives I can migrate as capacity grows.

Can I start with one stick of 16GB ECC RAM and add more as I replace the smaller hard drives with larger hard drives that should be cheaper in the future?

Thank you!

Martin
 

Ericloewe

Server Wrangler
Moderator
Joined
Feb 15, 2014
Messages
20,194

rmavillarica

Cadet
Joined
Oct 9, 2017
Messages
5
Thank you, sir!

It looks like I shall veer towards the X11SLL-CF. I meant to ask more questions, if I may: Is 8+2 a reasonable number of drives for RAIDZ2? And is my capacity growing strategy sound?

Thanks again!
 

Ericloewe

Server Wrangler
Moderator
Joined
Feb 15, 2014
Messages
20,194
Yes, 10-drive RAIDZ2 vdevs are okay. And yes, replacing smaller drives gradually is no problem.
 

Stux

MVP
Joined
Jun 2, 2016
Messages
4,419
Capacity will only grow based on the smallest drive.

Ie 10+3+3 is no better than 3+3+3
 

Ericloewe

Server Wrangler
Moderator
Joined
Feb 15, 2014
Messages
20,194
Capacity will only grow based on the smallest drive.

Ie 10+3+3 is no better than 3+3+3
With this crazy mishmash of drives, the pool will be autoexpanding rather frequently.
 

rmavillarica

Cadet
Joined
Oct 9, 2017
Messages
5
I just need to spread the expense out over 2-3 years. I am hoping it will expand by choice, and not involuntarily.
 

rmavillarica

Cadet
Joined
Oct 9, 2017
Messages
5
Another question: in a mismatched array such as the one I am planning, if the biggest drive fails, can I replace it with another drive bigger than the smallest drive since the capacity is based on the smallest drive?

Thank you.
 

Ericloewe

Server Wrangler
Moderator
Joined
Feb 15, 2014
Messages
20,194
I am hoping it will expand by choice, and not involuntarily.
You mean you don't want autoexpand on? That's fine, but you'll have to disable it manually.

Another question: in a mismatched array such as the one I am planning, if the biggest drive fails, can I replace it with another drive bigger than the smallest drive since the capacity is based on the smallest drive?

Thank you.
But smaller than the failed drive? I don't think I've ever seen that done, but I imagine it'll work fine.
 

rmavillarica

Cadet
Joined
Oct 9, 2017
Messages
5
You mean you don't want autoexpand on? That's fine, but you'll have to disable it manually.

I meant to say that I hope I choose when to replace the drive in order to autoexpand, rather than having the drives fail.

But smaller than the failed drive? I don't think I've ever seen that done, but I imagine it'll work fine.

Okay, just planning my spare drive strategy.

Thank you.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top