FreeNAS Success - ASUS C60M1-I mITX - Kingston 16GB 2X8GB DDR3 1600 RAM

Status
Not open for further replies.

kurtism

Dabbler
Joined
Jan 24, 2013
Messages
10
Hey Folks,

Just thought I would share my FreeNAS success story.

I had a DNS-323 with a 1TB seagate hard drive in it since around 2009 or so.... but I was running out of space on it... fortunatly I had another external 1TB USB LACIE drive laying around, so I transferred all the data from the DNS-323 onto this extra external hard drive I had.

I also happened to be using a Western Digital Black 1TB hard drive as my Windows 8 OS drive on my main desktop computer... thankfully I had 3 older smaller hard drives laying around and I was able to install my win8 on one of those hard drives for my main computer, and pull the 1TB drive from there too.

I then bought from ncix:
1 x ASUS C60M1-I AMD Fusion APU C-60 (1.0GHz, dual core) AMD Hudson M1 Mini ITX Motherboard/CPU Combo
1 x Kingston HyperX Blu Black Series 16GB 2X8GB DDR3 1600 RAM
1 x Kingston DTSE9H/16GBZ 16GB USB 2.0 DataTraveler SE9 USB stick
2 x Seagate Barracuda ST31000524AS 7200.12 1TB SATA 32MB Cache 3.5in Internal Hard Drive
1 x Antec 430watt 80plus power supply
salvaged/had laying around
1 x 3 or 4 year old seagate 1TB drive
1 x 1 or 2 year old western digital black 1TB drive
1 x ATX antec computer case from like 2001

I downloaded FreeNAS 8.3.0-RELEASE-p1
installed it on the kingston USB stick
setup all the hardware in the case.
fired it up and configured freenas in a 4 disk RAIDZ which came out to be just under 3TB of storage capacity.

it was AWESOME!

I wired my whole house with CAT6 cable, and I connect it all together with a little 8 port dlink unmanaged green 1Gbit network switch

I couldn't believe the difference in transfer speed between FreeNAS and that crappy Dlink DNS-323
the best I could EVER get from the DNS-323 was 12-15MBytes per second read and 9-10MBytes per second write.
with the FreeNAS right off the bat I started transferring my data back to it at 45-60MBytes/Second using Windows CIFS!
then I tried the read speed back to my computer... immediatly I had 70-80MBytes/Second!

I was shocked I've never seen such network transfer speeds in my house before.

it is so awesome!

I also configured the plugins jail and setup Transmission and minidlna... both worked flawlessly!

Thanks FreeNAS folks
 

gelno

Cadet
Joined
Jan 7, 2013
Messages
2
What you described is very similar to what I plan on doing...puts me at ease to see it work out well for you since I have yet set up a FreeNAS system myself

Thanks for the post!
 

kurtism

Dabbler
Joined
Jan 24, 2013
Messages
10
One problem I encountered is I can't use IE10 with the freeNAS web interface it just doesn't display properly... so I use firefox to administer it, no problem

the other oddity I noticed is every 30 minutes I get this message on the console:
Feb 1 16:07:58 freenas smartd[68724]: Device: /dev/ada3, 3 Currently unreadable (pending) sectors
Feb 1 16:07:58 freenas smartd[68724]: Device: /dev/ada3, 3 Offline uncorrectable sectors
Feb 1 16:37:59 freenas smartd[68724]: Device: /dev/ada3, 3 Currently unreadable (pending) sectors
Feb 1 16:37:59 freenas smartd[68724]: Device: /dev/ada3, 3 Offline uncorrectable sectors
Feb 1 17:07:58 freenas smartd[68724]: Device: /dev/ada3, 3 Currently unreadable (pending) sectors
Feb 1 17:07:58 freenas smartd[68724]: Device: /dev/ada3, 3 Offline uncorrectable sectors
Feb 1 17:38:00 freenas smartd[68724]: Device: /dev/ada3, 3 Currently unreadable (pending) sectors
Feb 1 17:38:00 freenas smartd[68724]: Device: /dev/ada3, 3 Offline uncorrectable sectors

other than that everything works perfectly.

these are the hard disks that show up in /var/run/dmesg.boot

Code:
ada0 at ahcich0 bus 0 scbus0 target 0 lun 0                                     
ada0: <ST31000524AS JC4B> ATA-8 SATA 3.x device                                 
ada0: 600.000MB/s transfers (SATA 3.x, UDMA6, PIO 8192bytes)                    
ada0: Command Queueing enabled                                                  
ada0: 953869MB (1953525168 512 byte sectors: 16H 63S/T 16383C)                  
ada1 at ahcich1 bus 0 scbus1 target 0 lun 0                                     
ada1: <ST31000524AS JC4B> ATA-8 SATA 3.x device                                 
ada1: 600.000MB/s transfers (SATA 3.x, UDMA6, PIO 8192bytes)                    
ada1: Command Queueing enabled                                                  
ada1: 953869MB (1953525168 512 byte sectors: 16H 63S/T 16383C)                  
ada2 at ahcich2 bus 0 scbus2 target 0 lun 0                                     
ada2: <WDC WD1002FAEX-00Z3A0 05.01D05> ATA-8 SATA 3.x device                    
ada2: 600.000MB/s transfers (SATA 3.x, UDMA6, PIO 8192bytes)                    
ada2: Command Queueing enabled                                                  
ada2: 953868MB (1953523055 512 byte sectors: 16H 63S/T 16383C)                  
ada3 at ahcich3 bus 0 scbus3 target 0 lun 0                                     
ada3: <ST31000340AS SD1A> ATA-8 SATA 1.x device                                 
ada3: 150.000MB/s transfers (SATA 1.x, UDMA6, PIO 8192bytes)                    
ada3: Command Queueing enabled                                                  
ada3: 953869MB (1953525168 512 byte sectors: 16H 63S/T 16383C)                  
 

Stephens

Patron
Joined
Jun 19, 2012
Messages
496
the other oddity I noticed is every 30 minutes I get this message on the console:
Feb 1 16:07:58 freenas smartd[68724]: Device: /dev/ada3, 3 Currently unreadable (pending) sectors
:
other than that everything works perfectly.

Except for the fact that your data is at risk, everything is fine? ;)
Pending Sectors
 

kurtism

Dabbler
Joined
Jan 24, 2013
Messages
10
ah I see... well 3 sectors doesn't seem so bad, there are quite a few sectors on the drive available... I wonder why the freenas web interface shows "status OK" with a green symbol if there are smartd errors? I guess that status indicates the health of the array only?
 

cyberjock

Inactive Account
Joined
Mar 25, 2012
Messages
19,526
ah I see... well 3 sectors doesn't seem so bad, there are quite a few sectors on the drive available... I wonder why the freenas web interface shows "status OK" with a green symbol if there are smartd errors? I guess that status indicates the health of the array only?

Precisely. But 3 bad sectors pretty much is a given that there will be alot more very soon. It's a fairly well known fact that sectors fail and the "error" seems to spread across the platters over time. Not always, but often enough that that single indicator is a VERY good indicator of drive health.
 

kurtism

Dabbler
Joined
Jan 24, 2013
Messages
10
bummer, well I'll keep an eye on it for sure, I hate spending money, but it is an OLD drive, maybe I'll grab a 3tb drive to replace it, and then slowly replace them all with 3tb drives as the other ones die.... this could take years
 

cyberjock

Inactive Account
Joined
Mar 25, 2012
Messages
19,526
Just some FYI. Your current pending sector count tells you that part of your data would be corrupt without redundnacy. If you have RAIDZ1 and a different disk fails you can pretty much expect file corruption. So "waiting" isn't exactly the best idea either. I would definitely do a scrub of your zpool. But, here's the catch. Doing a scrub could cause the drive to fail completely anyway. But if you have a different drive fail and you have to do a resilver and you have a RAIDZ1 you could lose the zpool.

Basically, consider that disk "failed" for most practical purposes.
 

kurtism

Dabbler
Joined
Jan 24, 2013
Messages
10
SOOOO... sure enough the pending sector count slowly continued to climb, pretty much every week it would go up one number, so when it hit 8 pending sectors I ordered a new 1TB seagate drive from newegg and went through the hard drive replacement procedure at http://www.freenas.org/images/resources/freenas8.3.1/freenas8.3.1_guide.html and it worked perfectly... it took about 4hours and 30minutes to resilver and it was awesome! I've also upgraded to freenas8.3.1.

now I get no more errors at the consol!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top