I'm not reporting to anyone, except myself:)
My first question would be: why does Supermicro list FAKE specifications on their site and user manual? Why list 128GB DIMMs as supported when they did not validate any?
Moderator hat on, that's out of bounds, please don't make accusations of FAKE specifications unless you have proof. And you already disproved it, since you said six modules did work. I understand your frustration, but let's be realistic and fair.
It is quite common for processor manufacturers to create support for DIMM sizes that do not yet exist.
Board manufacturers generally pass this information on verbatim. Since memory controllers these days are integrated into the CPU, "support" on a motherboard mostly means that you run the copper traces from the CPU socket to the RAM socket using the CPU manufacturer's specifications as a guide for maximum length and other technical issues. If a 64GB DIMM is the largest thing out there, but the CPU theoretically supports 128GB, it's totally reasonable for a manufacturer to list the hypothetical 128GB DIMM as supported on the basis that the CPU is capable of it, and the traces are all run in the same way, so it's sorta expected that it'll work.
Because this doesn't ACTUALLY work out 100% of the time in practice, the X9 Ivy Elpida debacle being the poster child for this, Supermicro also does test memory modules to identify specific ones that have passed. Quite often, these are the same ones that they resell under the Supermicro brand.
Saying that 128GB modules are supported does not mean EVERY 128GB module is supported, even if the specs seem to match.
System integrators often spend a lot of time and effort messing around with this kind of thing to get working configurations. If you don't have the resources to "swing-and-miss" at some of these configurations, please consider whether you might be better off buying a prebuilt system from a vendor who has validated a configuration.