I had to replace failing drive. I did it with exact same make and model (and capacity). Pool resilvered succesfully, but now, TrueNas is congusing me by showinf that drive differenly than the others, and claiming tha my pool have drives of different capacity:
(sdd was replaced, note that there is no icon being shown, no capacity shown, and no Disk Info shown).
lsblk show that all drives are partitioned the in the same fashion, but it seems that SWAP partition is not on on replaced drive:
zpoll status shows no problems:
Is there really no problem? Is TrueNas trying to tell me something, or is it a bug?
(sdd was replaced, note that there is no icon being shown, no capacity shown, and no Disk Info shown).
lsblk show that all drives are partitioned the in the same fashion, but it seems that SWAP partition is not on on replaced drive:
Code:
NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT sda 8:0 0 8001563222016 0 disk ├─sda1 8:1 0 2147418624 0 part │ └─md125 9:125 0 2145320960 0 raid1 │ └─md125 253:0 0 2145320960 0 crypt [SWAP] └─sda2 8:2 0 7999415655936 0 part sdb 8:16 0 8001563222016 0 disk ├─sdb1 8:17 0 2147418624 0 part │ └─md126 9:126 0 2145320960 0 raid1 │ └─md126 253:1 0 2145320960 0 crypt [SWAP] └─sdb2 8:18 0 7999415655936 0 part sdc 8:32 0 8001563222016 0 disk ├─sdc1 8:33 0 2147418624 0 part │ └─md126 9:126 0 2145320960 0 raid1 │ └─md126 253:1 0 2145320960 0 crypt [SWAP] └─sdc2 8:34 0 7999415655936 0 part sdd 8:48 0 8001563222016 0 disk ├─sdd1 8:49 0 2147418624 0 part └─sdd2 8:50 0 7999415655936 0 part sde 8:64 0 8001563222016 0 disk ├─sde1 8:65 0 2147418624 0 part │ └─md125 9:125 0 2145320960 0 raid1 │ └─md125 253:0 0 2145320960 0 crypt [SWAP] └─sde2 8:66 0 7999415655936 0 part
zpoll status shows no problems:
Code:
# zpool status cs01 pool: cs01 state: ONLINE scan: resilvered 5.69T in 10:21:48 with 0 errors on Wed Mar 8 20:22:53 2023 config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM cs01 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 722d0ad5-5d74-4608-a149-3aa1d783b160 ONLINE 0 0 0 a1a58ff4-3a99-4d4e-a3c9-8c50c60822c7 ONLINE 0 0 0 07f70d98-d1b9-4cd4-8e74-0267bbe74850 ONLINE 0 0 0 605f612e-fad3-454f-a53c-54b01f3ac00e ONLINE 0 0 0
Is there really no problem? Is TrueNas trying to tell me something, or is it a bug?