fabioteixei
Dabbler
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2022
- Messages
- 11
Hi there.
I'm building my NAS server and the use case it's only iSCSI Block Storage for an Hyper-V cluster, to store the VHDs.
I'm wondering which one to use for this, Scale or Core?
I'm normally chose core but I have find out that I have an Marvell controller that's not supported by Core because it doesn't have BSD drivers but it's supported on Scale since Debian has the drivers and the controller works fine. I known that I can always purchase an HBA (I have one already) but been able to use all the hardware I have it's a good thing.
I kinda like the way the things are presented and organized in Core better than in Scale (UI wise) but it's possible that Core in the future will become more like Scale in that aspect. I really hate the random eth interface names that Debian gives.
But these complaints are only nit picking.
So the question remains, Wich one it's better to do Block Storage only?
I'm building my NAS server and the use case it's only iSCSI Block Storage for an Hyper-V cluster, to store the VHDs.
I'm wondering which one to use for this, Scale or Core?
I'm normally chose core but I have find out that I have an Marvell controller that's not supported by Core because it doesn't have BSD drivers but it's supported on Scale since Debian has the drivers and the controller works fine. I known that I can always purchase an HBA (I have one already) but been able to use all the hardware I have it's a good thing.
I kinda like the way the things are presented and organized in Core better than in Scale (UI wise) but it's possible that Core in the future will become more like Scale in that aspect. I really hate the random eth interface names that Debian gives.
But these complaints are only nit picking.
So the question remains, Wich one it's better to do Block Storage only?