I've choosen Scale because its doc said that it could be scaled in or out easily, so I was thinking it was possible to create a zvol/vdev with 6 disks at fist and then later expand it to 10 or more disks when needs would be there.
reading this my expectations was that I will still have ONE RaidZ2 zvol with more disks and so more space in it for the datasets.
btw after adding that 4 new disks to it what I see is TWO RaidZ2 ! one with the original 6 disks and a new one with the same name with the 4 new disks...
the first one is still full, and the new is empty.
that's not exactly what I'll call 'scale'd storage.
what the heck ? if I need to backup and kill all each time I need to add disks to expand the storage of that nas what's the point to use such stuff that horribly add work on top of already too much work to do ??? where is the Scalabilty announced ?
reading this my expectations was that I will still have ONE RaidZ2 zvol with more disks and so more space in it for the datasets.
btw after adding that 4 new disks to it what I see is TWO RaidZ2 ! one with the original 6 disks and a new one with the same name with the 4 new disks...
the first one is still full, and the new is empty.
that's not exactly what I'll call 'scale'd storage.
what the heck ? if I need to backup and kill all each time I need to add disks to expand the storage of that nas what's the point to use such stuff that horribly add work on top of already too much work to do ??? where is the Scalabilty announced ?