Hello !
I'm creating my firt FreeNAS server and would like many advice.
I'm using a PowerEdge R510 with 16GB of RAM, a processor E5620 (12M cache, 2.40Ghz) a expandable RAID controller, and 4 WD 1TB + 4WD 2TB for storage.
I would use 2 mirrored bootable usb-stick (16GB) for FreeNAS system.
My goal is redudancy (one disk failure by RAID/RAIDZ) and performance : my FreeNas server will be connected to ESXi and configured for iSCSI.
I read that :
・ the ZFS filesystem for the storage and iSCSI causes many fragmentation issue. (It is recommended to keep the used space of the pool below 50% )
・ using ZFS with a RAIDZ is not recommended with a RAID controller.
・ FreenNas 9.3 support only ZFS.
After rading this, my initial solution, seem like a bad idea : FreeNas 9.3 with file system storage ZFS and 2 RAIDZ1 of about 3TB and about 6TB (with the raid controller in JBOD mode ).
Should i use FreeNas 9.2 with file system storage UFS and 2 RAID5 of 3TB and 6TB ? Do you think that this solution offers good compromise redudancy / performance ?
Thanks for your answers !
I'm creating my firt FreeNAS server and would like many advice.
I'm using a PowerEdge R510 with 16GB of RAM, a processor E5620 (12M cache, 2.40Ghz) a expandable RAID controller, and 4 WD 1TB + 4WD 2TB for storage.
I would use 2 mirrored bootable usb-stick (16GB) for FreeNAS system.
My goal is redudancy (one disk failure by RAID/RAIDZ) and performance : my FreeNas server will be connected to ESXi and configured for iSCSI.
I read that :
・ the ZFS filesystem for the storage and iSCSI causes many fragmentation issue. (It is recommended to keep the used space of the pool below 50% )
・ using ZFS with a RAIDZ is not recommended with a RAID controller.
・ FreenNas 9.3 support only ZFS.
After rading this, my initial solution, seem like a bad idea : FreeNas 9.3 with file system storage ZFS and 2 RAIDZ1 of about 3TB and about 6TB (with the raid controller in JBOD mode ).
Should i use FreeNas 9.2 with file system storage UFS and 2 RAID5 of 3TB and 6TB ? Do you think that this solution offers good compromise redudancy / performance ?
Thanks for your answers !