Hard Drive replacement High Raw Read & Seek Errors

VioletDragon

Patron
Joined
Aug 6, 2017
Messages
251
Howdy folks,

Ive ordered a new drive Seagate 1TB Barracuda ST1000DM010 to replace a failing drive, Smart Test Check out fine no errors but i am a bit worried about Raw_Read_Error_Rate and Seek_Error_Rate this seems a bit strange to me. Whats everyones take on this? I am currently running badblocks on the drive tho. I have Zeroed the drive out then run Smart long test.

Code:
ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME          FLAG     VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE      UPDATED  WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE
  1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate     0x000f   082   079   006    Pre-fail  Always       -       195585989
  3 Spin_Up_Time            0x0003   100   100   000    Pre-fail  Always       -       0
  4 Start_Stop_Count        0x0032   100   100   020    Old_age   Always       -       1
  5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct   0x0033   100   100   010    Pre-fail  Always       -       0
  7 Seek_Error_Rate         0x000f   060   060   045    Pre-fail  Always       -       1277536
  9 Power_On_Hours          0x0032   100   100   000    Old_age   Always       -       3
 10 Spin_Retry_Count        0x0013   100   100   097    Pre-fail  Always       -       0
 12 Power_Cycle_Count       0x0032   100   100   020    Old_age   Always       -       1
183 Runtime_Bad_Block       0x0032   100   100   000    Old_age   Always       -       0
184 End-to-End_Error        0x0032   100   100   099    Old_age   Always       -       0
187 Reported_Uncorrect      0x0032   100   100   000    Old_age   Always       -       0
188 Command_Timeout         0x0032   100   100   000    Old_age   Always       -       0 0 0
189 High_Fly_Writes         0x003a   100   100   000    Old_age   Always       -       0
190 Airflow_Temperature_Cel 0x0022   072   071   040    Old_age   Always       -       28 (Min/Max 17/29)
193 Load_Cycle_Count        0x0032   100   100   000    Old_age   Always       -       1
194 Temperature_Celsius     0x0022   028   017   000    Old_age   Always       -       28 (0 17 0 0 0)
195 Hardware_ECC_Recovered  0x001a   051   051   000    Old_age   Always       -       195585989
197 Current_Pending_Sector  0x0012   100   100   000    Old_age   Always       -       0
198 Offline_Uncorrectable   0x0010   100   100   000    Old_age   Offline      -       0
199 UDMA_CRC_Error_Count    0x003e   200   200   000    Old_age   Always       -       0
240 Head_Flying_Hours       0x0000   100   253   000    Old_age   Offline      -       3h+36m+14.615s
241 Total_LBAs_Written      0x0000   100   253   000    Old_age   Offline      -       1953525238
242 Total_LBAs_Read         0x0000   100   253   000    Old_age   Offline      -       8268

SMART Error Log Version: 1
No Errors Logged

SMART Self-test log structure revision number 1
Num  Test_Description    Status                  Remaining  LifeTime(hours)  LBA_of_first_error
# 1  Extended offline    Completed without error       00%         3         -
# 2  Short offline       Completed without error       00%         1         -
# 3  Short offline       Completed without error       00%         1         -



Thanks.

Jack.
 

sretalla

Powered by Neutrality
Moderator
Joined
Jan 1, 2016
Messages
9,703
Well, according to this: https://www.seagate.com/gb/en/internal-hard-drives/cmr-smr-list/ that disk shouldn't be SMR.

It is perfectly normal to have seagate SMART values in the high numbers since they use a different system of logging the values than makes sense to anyone I've met...

Apparently, the values are a mix of the total number of reads/writes together with the number of errors in one long either 48 or 64 bit value, which you then read the first or last 16 or 32 bits to get the value you want to know.

You can get it to print out "properly" by using something like this: smartctl -a -v 1,hex48 -v 7,hex48 /dev/daX ... you may need to do the research here (https://sdx1.net/info/hardware/smart-seagate/) and maybe elsewhere to get the right conversion syntax for 195 also. I can't help much more than that since I don't have any of those drives.[/I]
 

VioletDragon

Patron
Joined
Aug 6, 2017
Messages
251
Well, according to this: https://www.seagate.com/gb/en/internal-hard-drives/cmr-smr-list/ that disk shouldn't be SMR.

It is perfectly normal to have seagate SMART values in the high numbers since they use a different system of logging the values than makes sense to anyone I've met...

Apparently, the values are a mix of the total number of reads/writes together with the number of errors in one long either 48 or 64 bit value, which you then read the first or last 16 or 32 bits to get the value you want to know.

You can get it to print out "properly" by using something like this: smartctl -a -v 1,hex48 -v 7,hex48 /dev/daX ... you may need to do the research here (https://sdx1.net/info/hardware/smart-seagate/) and maybe elsewhere to get the right conversion syntax for 195 also. I can't help much more than that since I don't have any of those drives.[/I]

They are CMR disks, i have 6 of these drives in a mirror for iSCSI but had to replace one as it was reporting bad sectors. I am currently running badblocks so far so good.
 

VioletDragon

Patron
Joined
Aug 6, 2017
Messages
251
Update,

It past the badblocks. took about 11 hours to do. I will keep an eye on it tho.

Cheers.
 
Top