Milhouse - Thank you.
I haven't tried freeNAS 0.7, so you think freeNAS .7 will work better on a Proliant system than freeNAS 8.0.1, is? Is that because .7 is more stable than 8.0.1, or is 8.0.1 just not good enough for a small business.
The latter. It's not a question of stability, as FreeNAS 8.0.1 probably just as stable, rather it's a question of features and how well - or poorly - they are currently implemented in FreeNAS 8).
I started out with FreeNAS 0.7, which is the version I put "live", and have been testing FreeNAS 8 since it became available. However the latter is missing the kind of features that *I* would consider essential in any production environment, eg. 100% reliable and bullet proof disk failure/replacement (still very unreliable even in 8.0.1-RC2), working UPS support including Network UPS support (UPS support is partially implemented in 8.0.1-RC2, network support remains entirely missing), "push" rsync support and also rsync over ssh support (both missing in 8.0.1-RC2), working SMART tests (my LSI 9211 connected disks are not detected properly by the GUI in 8.0.1-RC2), no ability to configure startup/shutdown scripts via the GUI (meaning users need to modify the read-only filesystem, and lose these changes during an upgrade).
These are just my top 5 features that are working reliably in FreeNAS 0.7, yet are semi-functional at best, entirely missing at worst from even the latest 8.0.1-RC2. Other forum members may have their own pet features that are missing/not working, and you may not even care for any of mine. It's your choice. I'm not saying FreeNAS 8 is necessarily a bad choice, I'm just pointing out that depending on your needs you may be better off with the older version which is more "feature complete" and "battle hardened".
And yes, you should be considering a UPS for your office server. :)