Does this mean I should bring back the blinking animated GIFs for my signature? :DI did make some recent changes that impacted this. It looks like I had some reversed logic when setting up user groups. The less privileged group has signature restrictions and the more privileged / well known members should not. Whoops. Thanks for pointing this out.
Fixed!
Does this mean I should bring back the blinking animated GIFs for my signature? :D
Oh c'mon it wasn't that bad.Handling that @anodos gif was probably one of my most 'relieving moments' of enabling adblocker to a specific element x))))))
I wish I could agree.Oh c'mon it wasn't that bad.
How about:Yeah, we get the link thing now and then. If you can come up with some variation on "If you think a link is appropriate and relevant to a discussion, feel free to include it in your post. The moderators may remove links deemed inappropriate" to the rules, that'd be helpful. Spambots aside, I don't think this has been a problem.
The glitter made it that bad. Nothing good has ever resulted from glitter.Oh c'mon it wasn't that bad.
How about:
"External links are allowed, provided they are relevant to the discussion and do not link to material that would violate the forum rules. In particular, links to the following types of resources are generally acceptable:
Inappropriate links may be removed by the moderators."
- Articles related to the topic
- Product pages
- Parts lists (although a more forum-friendly format is recommended)
- Product reviews and analyses
The glitter made it that bad. Nothing good has ever resulted from glitter.