SOLVED Backplane choice for Supermicro 836 family chassis

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Aug 19, 2017
Messages
2
I have an old SC836 family chassis that I'm looking to revive for a storage array. It previously had a 3Ware 9XXX card in it which will be going to the summerlands. In looking over it I saw that it has a BPN-SAS-836TQ Revision 2.0 board. Doing some digging, I haven't found any strong indications of the difference between the 1.0, 2.0, and 3.2 revisions of the board.

I'm questioning replacing the backplane to ensure that I can handle SATA III without any issues. I'm going to be running a mix of Samsung SSDs and spinning rust to present volumes of a few different classes out of the host. For the purpose of this, let's figure 8 spinning disks and 8 SSDs. The chassis has plenty of PCI slots, so compensating with the correct number of LSI HBAs as to optimize the throughput shouldn't be an issue.

Does anyone have recommendations for:
Backplane to pick which will be able to handle the SSDs
Number of PCIe2 x8 HBAs to optimize the throughput? (I'm going to be replacing the motherboard as well, so PCIe3 isn't outside the realm of possibility, but it's not that high on my list of requirements).

Thanks.
 
Last edited:

Chris Moore

Hall of Famer
Joined
May 2, 2015
Messages
10,079
The TQ backplane is just a pass through, like a wire, it has next to no affect on the signaling. No need to change it unless you want to use a backplane with integrated SAS expander.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I537 using Tapatalk
 

Chris Moore

Hall of Famer
Joined
May 2, 2015
Messages
10,079

Ericloewe

Server Wrangler
Moderator
Joined
Feb 15, 2014
Messages
20,194
That said, a backplane with integrated expander would result in much neater wiring than a TQ + expander.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top