- Joined
- Dec 11, 2015
- Messages
- 1,410
yes.One question left: you say two separate machines for main/backup are better option than two separate volumes within one system. If I go with two separate volumes is that a lot worse scenario?
There is in practice no added risk to run 2 vdevs in one pool compared to 2 pools one vdev each.
You would protect yourself slightly from user-errors that cause ZFS to crack.
The point with RAIDZ2 and SMART, SCRUBS, email notificatinos, checkups on health, is that data should never be compromised on a vdev basis.
However, if you have the same data in 2 machines I would think you are less likely to make the same fatal mistake to both machines at the same time.
Remember, most of the posts where users have "lost all their data" on the forum is related to:
- messing up via CLI thinking they are clever
- not configuring warnings systems
- disregarding error messages
- massive user errors such as not paying attention encryption directives.
- Not checking system stability and burning in drives/RAM prior to committing
Don't be afraid of multiple vdevs in one pool. Think about it, mirrors are ...just that.