How safe it is to run BETA candidates?

Status
Not open for further replies.

pie3

Cadet
Joined
Jul 7, 2012
Messages
8
Hey there,

I was wondering how safe a BETA FreeNAS version "usually" is,
is there a significant risk you've experienced yourself that, let's say it runs amok and wipes UFS/ZFS partitions? :) - Or does something else that "simply" results in a serious amount of shell-fiddling to fix it?

Any insight assessments out of code/system-knowledge or any user experience?

Thanks for your reply.
 

jgreco

Resident Grinch
Joined
May 29, 2011
Messages
18,680
If you have no qualms about completely losing your configuration and having to start over from scratch, I'd categorize it in the "EXTREMELY low risk of losing data" department. I have one or two potential caveats to that, though.

A fresh FreeNAS install has a reasonably decent ability to import existing filesystems, especially ones previously created by FreeNAS. What that means is that you can rip out your old FreeNAS 8.0 flash and stick in your new FreeNAS 8.2 flash, import, and then spend a few hours recreating your config if you didn't happen to save the old one. :smile: But when you do, you should be up and running.

Configurations are NOT guaranteed to be importable between versions except for ... released code, I think? We ran into a situation where someone had suggested that we run a nightly build to see if a problem went away, but basically it resulted in a config db that was incompatible with future versions, and upon trying to import it, it turned out that not only was the code non-resilient to rejecting an incompatible configuration, but it actively rendered the install unfixable (short of going in and manually editing the database). I believe that they make reasonable attempts to ensure that BETA candidates can be upgraded to RELEASE versions, but beware and be prepared. In particular, don't invest incredible amounts of time in a thorough FreeNAS configuration that sets every possible bit in every menu, etc.

I would also advise against trying to import a broken pool of some sort, such as a pool with a failed or missing disk. While I'd wager a small sum that it would manage the situation successfully, the fact of the matter is that it's uncommon, and uncommon things are less tested.
 

ProtoSD

MVP
Joined
Jul 1, 2011
Messages
3,348
I seem to recall a bug with 8.2 Beta-2 that caused at least one person to completely lose their data. So I don't recommend running Beta on any kind of production system or in any situation where they don't have a backup...
 

paleoN

Wizard
Joined
Apr 22, 2012
Messages
1,402
I seem to recall a bug with 8.2 Beta-2 that caused at least one person to completely lose their data. So I don't recommend running Beta on any kind of production system or in any situation where they don't have a backup...
That was with the plugin jail. 8.2 Betas seem stable enough as long as you stay away from the jails. Of course I've only used my for testing so far.
 

Hexland

Contributor
Joined
Jan 17, 2012
Messages
110
That was with the plugin jail. 8.2 Betas seem stable enough as long as you stay away from the jails. Of course I've only used my for testing so far.

Which is a little ironic since the point of a jail is to isolate the process from the system ;)
 

gwdweb

Cadet
Joined
Jul 13, 2012
Messages
1
I have installed BETA 4 and after trying to reboot the system it stalls during reboot with errors. The flash drive that I am booting from gets corrupted and will no longer boot from it. This has happened several times. If it continues, I will go back to 8.0 until they come out with the official 8.2. It does not seem to affect the data since that is on other HDs.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top