Volume size Web-Frontend vs. Terminal

[gaelic]

Hello.

The Values given for Used/Available/Size in the Webfrontend differ from the ones in Terminal and I don't know how to interpret:

Code:

df -h

Filesystem             Size    Used   Avail Capacity  Mounted on
data1                  608G     71M    608G     0%    /mnt/data1
data1/angus            634G     26G    608G     4%    /mnt/data1/angus
data1/programs         613G    4.6G    608G     1%    /mnt/data1/programs
data1/public           646G     38G    608G     6%    /mnt/data1/public
backup1                233G     23K    233G     0%    /mnt/backup1
backup1/public         290G     57G    233G    20%    /mnt/backup1/public

where backup1/public is a local ZFS-Replication from data1/public

In the Browser

for data1/angus following results are given: 26G / 608G / 634G (used/available/size)
or data1/programs: 4.6G / 608G / 612G

Why is there a difference in Size, both Webfrontend and Terminal. And Why is the Replication Dataset in backup1 not displayed? The Volume total Size just decreases. Is there any way to display Replication Data in the Frontend? Further: Is recovery in the Frontend possible / Howto for the Terminal?

Andy Hint? Thx in advance.

 

[louisk]

You are seeing different ways of rounding for the numbers being reported. You can try (on the terminal) df -k to see a more detailed set of numbers.