Lucas Rey
Contributor
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2011
- Messages
- 180
Dear community,
yes, I already know, it's a redundant question, and I'd already read tons of posts about this argument, but it still not clear, for my personal needs, if ZFS is better then UFS.
I'm going to build a NAS with the following disk configs:
4 x 1Tb RAIDZ1
or
2 x 3Tb MIRROR
I still need to decide the config, but it's not important for now.
Assuming for instance I don't use for now the ZFS features (like dataset, snapshot, etc....), regarding performance, which is better (read/write throughput) from UFS and ZFS using the same disk configuration? And in general, are there real pros or cons using ZFS instead of UFS? Like stability, better dataloss/recovery, etc....
Many thanks!
Lucas
yes, I already know, it's a redundant question, and I'd already read tons of posts about this argument, but it still not clear, for my personal needs, if ZFS is better then UFS.
I'm going to build a NAS with the following disk configs:
4 x 1Tb RAIDZ1
or
2 x 3Tb MIRROR
I still need to decide the config, but it's not important for now.
Assuming for instance I don't use for now the ZFS features (like dataset, snapshot, etc....), regarding performance, which is better (read/write throughput) from UFS and ZFS using the same disk configuration? And in general, are there real pros or cons using ZFS instead of UFS? Like stability, better dataloss/recovery, etc....
Many thanks!
Lucas