What I mean when I say "it doesn't add value" is that it doesn't really add much more value than simply warning you if temps are above your pre-determined threshold.
For example, I get an email at 37C. Do I care if it's 30C or 20C? Not really. It's not overheating so I don't care. And let's be honest with ourselves. What's more likely to catch an overheating drive? The admin that logs in just more frequently than never or a monitoring program like SMART that is checked at regular intervals?
If you *do* feel the urge to see the actual temp, smartctl will let you get the temp. But the reality is that as long as it's not "too hot" for whatever definition of "too hot" you want to use is, then the disk is okay.
Sure, there's a bunch of edge cases, but spending hours adding a feature for that occasional edge case isn't exactly maximizing limited developer resources.
And you'd be correct that "there's demand" for it. But just because there is demand doesn't mean there is an urgent need either.
If you've done a proper setup of your server you should never *need* to monitor it. If you *want* to monitor it that's one thing. But the need isn't there because FreeNAS is designed to email you if anything goes wrong. iXsystems is trying to solve major problems with very limited developer resources. So "needs" far outweigh "wants". The ticket does exist in the system and has for quite some time. It will hopefully be added someday. When extra developer resources exist for "wants" then it might be added. Or if some free-lancer wants to add the feature I'm sure iX would appreciate the support. But, until then the needs that FreeNAS has outweighs the wants. ;)
Just as a thought, do you know how many times I've looked at the reporting tab on my own server this year? Never. Not once. Do you know why? Because my FreeNAS box is properly setup to email me in the event there is a problem. If they added SMART temps they are something I'd look at when I upgraded my FreeNAS box, thought "how cool" and then promptly never looked at again.