SA3114 SATA Controller

Status
Not open for further replies.

pirateghost

Unintelligible Geek
Joined
Feb 29, 2012
Messages
4,219
you shouldnt need a driver. i have used that card before and it should just work.
 

fizzgig656

Contributor
Joined
Nov 6, 2012
Messages
192
hi, ive just sent one of them back, sorry to say, unless i was unlucky, the card seem to work with freenas fine unless raiding, i set up a 4 disk raid 5, checked and double checked, but freenas would not see the raid5, instead it saw the individual disks, if i rebooted the card said it was still raid 5?. Its ok if you just want the extra sata connectors!
sorry and hope this helps - it may of just been my back luck.
 

AlanJarvis

Cadet
Joined
Nov 22, 2012
Messages
5
you shouldnt need a driver. i have used that card before and it should just work.

OK thanks I will plug it all up tomorrow and see what happens. I would like to use RAID5 but the instructions that come with t card say it only supports RAID 0 and 1. Not sure if Fizzgig656 was trying hardware RAID with the card or software RAID with FreeNAS

Alan
 

fizzgig656

Contributor
Joined
Nov 6, 2012
Messages
192
OK thanks I will plug it all up tomorrow and see what happens. I would like to use RAID5 but the instructions that come with t card say it only supports RAID 0 and 1. Not sure if Fizzgig656 was trying hardware RAID with the card or software RAID with FreeNAS

Alan

yep hardware raid5, the instructions do state raid 0 and 1 (although the sellers instructions state Supports RAID 0, 1, 5, 0+1, JBOD12), but the bios of the card does give you raid 5 options. be good to see how you get on.
 

pirateghost

Unintelligible Geek
Joined
Feb 29, 2012
Messages
4,219
that card will not do a true hardware raid5. you would be much better off using ZFS as intended with FreeNAS.

cards like that rely on software raid, and linux and BSD OSes will not utilize the software raid.

Just use ZFS, it will be much better in the long run
 

cyberjock

Inactive Account
Joined
Mar 25, 2012
Messages
19,526
Just to add to pirateghost...

If you read the manual it explains pretty clearly why hardware RAID is bad for ZFS and why you shouldn't use it. So any reason you are ignoring the manual?
 

fizzgig656

Contributor
Joined
Nov 6, 2012
Messages
192
just for clarity, i had planned on not using zfs as i only had 4gb ram installed but wanted raid5 for light home use, hence i bought as cheap card thinking it would provide the raid5. when i tried it and found not to work my hand was forced and after reading how raid-z is better i though id chance running only 4gb ram and use raidz.(hoping to up it if my M/ b can handle it) I sent the card back.

Also the pci will not be as quick as M/B sata or PCI-e sata's, well in my testing....
 

cyberjock

Inactive Account
Joined
Mar 25, 2012
Messages
19,526
Also the pci will not be as quick as M/B sata or PCI-e sata's, well in my testing....

A single fast hard drive can be limited by the PCI bus.
 

AlanJarvis

Cadet
Joined
Nov 22, 2012
Messages
5
I read the manual last night and it does say "NOTE: instead of mixing ZFS RAID with hardware RAID, it is recommended that you place your hardware RAID controller in JBOD mode and let ZFS handle the RAID". I hope to have time to try it out tonight. The system I'm testing it on only has 2Gb RAM. It this going to be a problem?
Alan
 

JaimieV

Guru
Joined
Oct 12, 2012
Messages
742
I run 4x1Tb disks with ZFS (striped) in just 1gig RAM, no issues over the last year. It's my backups server, not the one that gets used by multiple clients!

(BTW, since this is a totally different question you should have started a new topic really - more likely to get answers)
 

cyberjock

Inactive Account
Joined
Mar 25, 2012
Messages
19,526
In my experience, any PCI-based SATA controllers are limited to SATA 150 Mbps.

Even then, it doesn't matter if it was SATA 1,000,000. Your PCI bus(all devices combined) is limited to 133MB/sec. So accessing any device won't be any faster than 133MB/sec(of course, minus overhead and any other PCI device communication).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top