How to plan for an ever growing folder share?

Status
Not open for further replies.

killervette

Dabbler
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
11
So I currently have 4tb in blurays on my unraid server. I am thinking of switching to freeness for raidz. I have 10 1tb drives and 1 2tb with plans to buy 2 more. How should I setup my volumes for a growing bluray folder a movies folder that is 1tb and growing among 3tb of other files. I am a little overwhelmed in planning the data migration.
 

ProtoSD

MVP
Joined
Jul 1, 2011
Messages
3,348
So just to clarify, do your 10 1TB drives and 1 2TB drive have data on them already?
I'm a little confused about what you're asking with
1tb and growing among 3tb of other files.

Definitely go with Raidz2 over z1.
 

killervette

Dabbler
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
11
Sorry. Yeah I have About 9tb of data. 4tb is in a folder bluray. In unraid, I can just add drives and it expands the bluray available storage.

In freenas, I could create 2 (5 x 1tb raidz2) and those would be raid 0 together. If I added another set of 5x1tb to that, would my bluray folder have more available storage. I don't want to have a bluray1 then bluray2 folders and so on.
 

ProtoSD

MVP
Joined
Jul 1, 2011
Messages
3,348
There's not really much point in doing a raid-0 of a raidz2, just make all 10 drive one big raidz2. I'm not sure if you can make a dataset span volumes, that could solve your problem of only wanting one folder for your bluray stuff. @Mattwowen01 could probably tell you off the top of his head if he reads this post later.
 

killervette

Dabbler
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
11
is there a disadvatange to doing the raid0 across them? I dont have much choice because i have to add a couple drives and move my existing data, then add those drives move data....etc.

So you think if i have a dataset on a volume, then add another volume, that dataset might not use the new storage? that would suck.
 

ProtoSD

MVP
Joined
Jul 1, 2011
Messages
3,348
The disadvantage is you're wasting disks, with z2 you can already loose any 2 disks and still access your data, by doing a raid0 your redundancy increases and makes things a little more complicated, but you loose all those other disks you could be storing data on.

So you think if i have a dataset on a volume, then add another volume, that dataset might not use the new storage? that would suck.

No, sorry that's not what I meant. I was thinking a dataset *might* be able to span your volumes which is what you want if you only want one bluray folder. I only use datasets on one volume, so I'm not sure if they can span volumes.
 

killervette

Dabbler
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
11
Lets try this. How would you set the following up:
I have 3 2TB drives and 10 1TB drives.

Bluray folder is at 4TB and growing
Movies is at 1TB and growing
TV is at 2.5TB and growing

I have about 1.5TB of other random crap. I absolutely need redundancy on TV and the random crap. I would like redun. on the bluray and movies too, but i am not 100% on it.

Also, my data is already existing on a server that i will migrate over, so i may not have access to all the disks to start off.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top