Some time ago Nathan Gray tested how much of the Apple filesystem was actually captured with various backup tools. Of particular interest was the Apple resource fork, a way to store information relating in one way or another to the file.
However, moving a HFS+ file to a different file system, such as ZFS on FreeNAS is no guarantee that all the 'extra' information is preserved in the transfer (could be as simple as that the other file system has no room for the construct in its architecture).
The test suite and methodology originally published by Nathan Gray (see this link: http://www.n8gray.org/code/backup-bouncer/) has later been elaborated on by Mike Bombich (see this link: http://www.bombich.com/groups/ccc/wiki/7ba51/).
My question is: Has anyone (vastly more talented than me) run these test suites together with FreeNas?
Are Apple and ZFS/FreeNAS users really missing anything, or is there something we should avoid, etc?
However, moving a HFS+ file to a different file system, such as ZFS on FreeNAS is no guarantee that all the 'extra' information is preserved in the transfer (could be as simple as that the other file system has no room for the construct in its architecture).
The test suite and methodology originally published by Nathan Gray (see this link: http://www.n8gray.org/code/backup-bouncer/) has later been elaborated on by Mike Bombich (see this link: http://www.bombich.com/groups/ccc/wiki/7ba51/).
My question is: Has anyone (vastly more talented than me) run these test suites together with FreeNas?
Are Apple and ZFS/FreeNAS users really missing anything, or is there something we should avoid, etc?