It's OK not to know this stuff, after all, could you make intelligent comments on an xray crystallography forum?
Nope, but I wouldn't jump in a forum about xray crystallography and start throwing words around I don't understand. And if it had a manual I'd read it. If you read the FreeNAS manual its on the front freakin' cover!
Ok, ok.. some people don't "read" the front cover. So let's go to chapter 1, "Introduction".. the first sentence...
FreeNAS® is an embedded open source network-attached storage (NAS) system based on FreeBSD and released under a BSD license.
Let's not mention how many times this FreeBSD versus Linux thing has been hashed out in the forum. Quite frankly if someone shows up in the forum and says or implies that FreeBSD is based on Linux should NOT be allowed to post in the forum anymore. This, by default, means they didn't read the manual or much of ANY material on FreeNAS at all and are wanting a quick fix without learning anything.
I think a major purpose of FreeNAS is so that you don't have to learn about unix and ZFS.
I disagree, partly. Sure, I might not be able to use the CLI like a boss, but you'd better know enough about ZFS to understand what kind of redundancy you want, advantages and disadvantages to ZFS, and what you can and can't do with it. There is a certain level of knowledge you'd better meet before you start throwing together a server or you'll be sorry(or very lucky).
But it is very surprising that a person who is involved with a backup company and who knows enough about FreeNAS to get to this forum would think his Linux client could work. I'm sure it could be ported to run in BSD. One would have thought a person in the business would know this.
That is my problem with the post. That is clearly someone that spent zero time trying to understand FreeNAS. They showed up, made an account, threw in their advertisement, and split. They didn't read the manual(see above), didn't peruse the forum(again.. see above), and weren't interested in actually making a meaningful post that would benefit the user. They just wanted their advertisement. They look like fools to me, and while I can't remember what their company was called right now I assure you I'll remember it if someone asks me what I think of it in the future(ahh.. the great things about having good brains). And what I will have to say won't be too pretty. When their employees aren't familiar with even the most basic IT stuff but are posting garbage like they did I'd never give them a dime of my money or trust them with a MB of my data. This would be like a Dell employee trying to tell me their latest Dell server is the answer to my problems when I'm having issues with my Android based Motorola cell phone.