nico-truenas
Cadet
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2021
- Messages
- 5
Hi all
I'm running a TrueNAS 12 system and I would like to replicate some zfs snaphosts to a jail hosted on another TrueNAS server of a friend of mine.
He has created a jail and a dedicated dataset for me, I can see it in the jail, everything looks fine.
But when I use zfs send/zfs receive, I get the following message "cannot receive new filesystem stream: invalid backup stream".
I have spent a lot of time searching the internet and I wonder if the feature large_dnode is not the issue.
From the target jail, I can see that the zpool has this feature inactive/unsupported "unsupported@org.zfsonlinux:large_dnode inactive local". But this feature is enable if I ask my friend to query the pool directly from the TrueNas system "feature@large_dnode enabled local".
We don't want to use TrueNAS replication as it will give me access to all the data of my friend's NAS via SSH. Or we have to spend time to do a setup to avoid that.
Is there a way to solve this issue ? Or I'm totally wrong with this approach ?
Thanks
I'm running a TrueNAS 12 system and I would like to replicate some zfs snaphosts to a jail hosted on another TrueNAS server of a friend of mine.
He has created a jail and a dedicated dataset for me, I can see it in the jail, everything looks fine.
But when I use zfs send/zfs receive, I get the following message "cannot receive new filesystem stream: invalid backup stream".
I have spent a lot of time searching the internet and I wonder if the feature large_dnode is not the issue.
From the target jail, I can see that the zpool has this feature inactive/unsupported "unsupported@org.zfsonlinux:large_dnode inactive local". But this feature is enable if I ask my friend to query the pool directly from the TrueNas system "feature@large_dnode enabled local".
We don't want to use TrueNAS replication as it will give me access to all the data of my friend's NAS via SSH. Or we have to spend time to do a setup to avoid that.
Is there a way to solve this issue ? Or I'm totally wrong with this approach ?
Thanks