mka
Contributor
- Joined
 - Sep 26, 2013
 
- Messages
 - 107
 
Hi,
 
I'm very pleased with the overall performance of my current FreeNAS system. I 'm able to write with ~105MiB/s to my new system (resulting in approx 20% cpu load with Intel G3220, 16GiB ECC Ram, 6x WD Red 4TB on-board controller).
 
But what I find rather annoying that while copying with that amount of bandwidth to the FreeNAS system, every other samba operation is put almost on hold. While copying with 100MiB I can barely access file folders, it takes 4 to 5sec just to access the folder... although they are cached and should reside in ARC memory (accessed multiple times bevor the transfer) and the samba process is just using 20% cpu load.
 
Is this the case or what is the problem here? It look to me the file browsing activities a somehow queued with the rest of the transfer. Is it possible to change this behavior? let samba somehow priorities user browsing activity over transfer throughput?
 
Thanks :)
	
		
			
		
		
	
			
			I'm very pleased with the overall performance of my current FreeNAS system. I 'm able to write with ~105MiB/s to my new system (resulting in approx 20% cpu load with Intel G3220, 16GiB ECC Ram, 6x WD Red 4TB on-board controller).
But what I find rather annoying that while copying with that amount of bandwidth to the FreeNAS system, every other samba operation is put almost on hold. While copying with 100MiB I can barely access file folders, it takes 4 to 5sec just to access the folder... although they are cached and should reside in ARC memory (accessed multiple times bevor the transfer) and the samba process is just using 20% cpu load.
Is this the case or what is the problem here? It look to me the file browsing activities a somehow queued with the rest of the transfer. Is it possible to change this behavior? let samba somehow priorities user browsing activity over transfer throughput?
Thanks :)